In setting the project objectives, the Board observed that revenue is commonly viewed as a critical number to users of financial statements in assessing an entity’s financial performance and position. Additionally, the Board noted that revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP differ from those in IFRS. The introduction of a comprehensive and converged standard on revenue recognition will enable users to better understand and consistently analyze an entity’s revenue across industries, transactions, and geographies.
The guidance on revenue recognition in U.S. GAAP was initially limited to the general guidance in Concepts Statement No. 5, Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises. Concepts Statement 5 specifies that an entity should recognize revenue only when realized or realizable and earned. Those recognition and measurement concepts were codified in Subtopic 605-10, Revenue Recognition–Overall. Additionally, FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial Statements, defines revenues as inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other activities that constitute the entity’s ongoing major or central operations.
In 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition, which provides interpretive guidance on how a public entity should apply the realized or realizable and earned criteria in Concepts Statement 5 to arrangements not within the scope of other, specific authoritative literature on revenue recognition. SAB 101 (amended in 2003 by SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and codified into SAB Topic 13), requires an entity to satisfy specific criteria before recognizing revenue. Nonpublic entities are not subject to this guidance; however, the Board understands that some apply it in practice by analogy.
Additional guidance for recognizing revenue in U.S. GAAP consists of numerous industry-specific and transaction-specific standards (for example, Subtopic 985-605, Software—Revenue Recognition, Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, Subtopic 360-20, Property, Plant, and Equipment—Real Estate Sales, and Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition—Multiple-Element Arrangements). Those requirements were developed by various standard setters often to address narrow issues or transactions without reference to a common framework. Consequently, issues about recognizing revenue were often difficult to resolve, and economically similar transactions sometimes yielded differing revenue recognition.
The guidance for recognizing revenue in IFRS was comparatively limited and was based on different fundamental principles. IFRS lacked guidance on particular topics that were challenging to address in practice (for example, multiple-element arrangements). Consequently, the guidance for recognizing revenue under IFRS was difficult to apply to many complex transactions, and many times in the absence of specific guidance an entity may use, or analogize, to U.S. GAAP.
Under current U.S. GAAP, the required disclosures about revenue were limited and lacked cohesion. General disclosure requirements about revenue recognition were limited to descriptions of an entity’s related accounting policies and the effect on revenue of those policies, including rights of return, the entity’s role as a principal or an agent, and customer payments and incentives. Some industry-specific or transaction-specific revenue recognition guidance required more extensive disclosures; however, investors and other users of financial statements indicated that the previous disclosure requirements about revenue in both U.S. GAAP and IFRS were insufficient for analyzing an entity’s revenue.
The Board considered the existing guidance on revenue recognition and concluded that the new revenue recognition guidance in this Update will provide an improvement to financial reporting.
As compared to existing guidance on revenue recognition, this Update will significantly enhance comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets. The largely principles-based guidance in this Update provides a framework for addressing revenue recognition issues comprehensively for entities that apply U.S. GAAP in addition to those entities that apply IFRS. Because the guidance in this Update is principles-based, it can be applied to all contracts with customers regardless of industry-specific or transaction-specific fact patterns. Additionally, the Board concluded that a framework for revenue recognition best ensures that the guidance remains relevant as markets and transactions evolve.
The guidance in this Update also improves U.S. GAAP by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must consider in recognizing revenue. For example, before this Update an entity would have potentially considered industry-specific revenue guidance for some transactions, in addition to general revenue guidance and potentially other relevant guidance that commonly affects revenue transactions. Rather than referring to several locations for guidance, this Update provides a comprehensive framework within Topic 606. As a result of issuing this Update, the Board concluded that over time the guidance for recognizing revenue in U.S. GAAP should be less complex than current guidance.
Additionally, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized. The comprehensive disclosure package will improve the understandability of revenue, which is a critical part of the analysis of an entity’s performance and prospects. Furthermore, this Update provides guidance for transactions that are not addressed comprehensively (for example, service revenue, contract modifications, and licenses of intellectual property). Finally, the guidance will apply to all entities, including nonpublic entities that previously did not have extensive guidance.