Expand
Reference(s): Sections 606-10-15, 860-50-15, 606-10-32, and 606-10-25
Some financial institutions originate loans (primarily mortgage loans) and subsequently sell them to third parties (for example, government-sponsored entities that securitize large quantities of similar loan assets). When a financial institution sells the loan to a third party, it sometimes retains the right to service the financial asset. Additionally, entities may acquire or assume the rights to service financial assets.
The entity that services a loan (servicer) performs various services, such as communication with the borrower and collection of interest, principal, and escrow payments. The level of service provided by the servicer depends on the type of loan and contractually specified terms. In exchange for servicing the loan, the servicer receives a contractually specified servicing fee. The servicer also could be compensated for their servicing activities through late fees as well as interest income earned on cash received and held before being remitted to another party (sometimes referred to as float).
In addition, a servicer might engage another entity (sub-servicer) to perform certain servicing tasks based on a contractual agreement. Unless otherwise noted, references to servicing income contemplate both servicing and sub-servicing income.
Paragraph 606-10-15-2(c) contains a scope exception for financial instruments and other contractual rights or obligations within the scope of Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. Subtopic 860-50 requires that an intangible asset or liability be initially recognized, at fair value, when the expected future servicing cash flows (that is, the benefits of servicing) are in excess of the going market rate for those services (defined as adequate compensation in Topic 860). If the servicing fees over the life of the servicing contract are expected to provide the servicer with more than adequate compensation, then the servicer recognizes an asset; if it is expected to be less than adequate compensation, then the servicer recognizes a liability. These assets or liabilities must be either remeasured at fair value each period or amortized over the course of the servicing contract. If an entity uses the amortization method, it must assess servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation at each reporting date. Total expected cash flows (which reflect expectations of collectibility) from the servicing fee are a key input into the measurement of the asset or liability.
Regardless of whether a servicing asset or liability exists (or is measured at zero because the servicing income is equal to adequate compensation), the servicer is entitled to the contractually specified servicing fee each period. The staff’s understanding is that under current practice, servicers generally record servicing income as it is received. In some situations, servicers consider the principles for revenue recognition in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 13, Revenue Recognition. For example, an entity may consider whether amounts are fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured before recognizing revenue.
While Topic 860 includes detailed guidance on the initial recognition and subsequent measurement of servicing assets and liabilities, it does not include explicit guidance describing the revenue recognition of contractually specified servicing fees. However, based on the guidance in Topic 860 that requires a fair value estimate (or evaluation of impairment) at each reporting date, some stakeholders noted that the subsequent measurement guidance in Topic 860 provides implicit guidance on how to account for the servicing cash flows; that is, they view the remeasurement of the asset/liability and the collection of servicing fees (which gives rise to recording of the servicing income) as being closely linked. In a typical servicing arrangement, the servicer generally receives and records servicing fees as income each period. During each period, an amortization or remeasurement entry is made for the mortgage servicing right (MSR) asset/liability, which contemplates the receipt (or nonreceipt) of the servicing income for that period. The servicing income, including expectations of future servicing cash flows, are inputs for the measurement of the MSR asset/liability. The net result on the income statement is that the servicer records the contractual cash received in each period as income, offset by the amortization or remeasurement of the MSR asset/liability. Topic 860 describes the subsequent measurement of the MSR asset/liability.
In the staff’s view, servicing arrangements that are within the scope of Topic 860 (which should not change as a result of Topic 606) are not within the scope of Topic 606. The staff acknowledges the different views about what those servicing cash flows represent (revenue versus realization of an intangible asset/liability) and thinks there is merit to the assertion that Topic 860 provides guidance on how to reflect the servicing cash flows via subsequent measurement of the MSR asset/liability. In reaching its view, the staff placed weight on the following factors:
(a) Topic 860 is included within the scope exceptions of Topic 606 in paragraph 606-10-15-2. The guidance in Topic 860 is an accounting model (including disclosure requirements) that evolved over the course of previous standard setting that requires servicing arrangements to be recognized on the balance sheet akin to a financial asset and allows for an entity to measure the MSR asset/liability at fair value each reporting period.
(b) Topic 860 includes disclosure requirements for servicing arrangements, including the total servicing fees received and a disaggregation of the different components. Topic 860 also includes disclosures relating to assumptions used to calculate fair value, which would incorporate all servicing cash flows, including the inputs related to adequate compensation.
(c) Recognition outcomes under Topic 606 (if the services are considered a series in accordance with paragraph 606-10-25-15 and the variable consideration meets the criteria in paragraph 606-10-32-40 to be allocated to each increment of service (for example, a month)) likely would be similar to the way in which practice applies Topic 860.
(d) Applying Topic 606 to servicing arrangements could lead to practice questions (and potentially amendments to Topic 860), specifically with regards to the notion that expected cash flows currently factor into the measurement of the MSR asset/liability rather than the recognized revenue amounts. Those would be two different bases (actual cash flows and revenue per Topic 606) upon which the same cash flow stream in the same contract is recognized/measured.
However, in the staff’s view, it would not be concerning if an entity that applies Topic 860 refers to the accounting framework described in Topic 606 to assist with recognition conclusions for servicing income or to provide the disclosures required by Topic 606 to the extent they are applicable and incremental to the disclosure requirements of Topic 860.
The staff also considered other fact patterns raised by stakeholders in the context of this scoping question:
(a) Residual fees or income related to servicing (for example, nonsufficient funds charges and modification fees). The staff believes that the scoping framework described above also would apply to those fees because they are all considered benefits of servicing and, therefore, are incorporated into the measurement of the MSR asset/liability.
(b) Income earned in situations in which a servicing asset is not obtained, or a service liability is not incurred under Topic 860. The scope of Topic 860 includes transactions in which servicing assets are obtained and servicing liabilities are incurred, including transactions in which loans are transferred with servicing retained by the transferor. If a servicing arrangement is not within the scope of Topic 860, the staff thinks it is clear on the basis of the scoping guidance in paragraph 606-10-15-2 that all servicing (or sub-servicing) income would be within the scope of Topic 606. The staff thinks that even if the amounts of servicing income are determined at the reporting date to be at adequate compensation (and, therefore, no servicing asset or servicing liability is recorded), an entity would need to still consider the various requirements in Topic 860; therefore, these arrangements would be outside the scope of Topic 606.
(c) Servicing asset/liability subsequent measurement at fair value versus amortized cost. Under either method, the periodic reductions in the MSR asset/liability in accordance with the subsequent measurement guidance in Topic 860 reflect only the difference between the actual fees and adequate compensation; therefore, the staff thinks that the servicer’s election regarding how to remeasure the MSR asset/liability does not affect the scoping considerations described above.
(d) Hedging. The staff notes that some entities utilize hedging strategies to offset the income statement volatility of the MSR asset/liability remeasurement, but the staff thinks this is irrelevant to the scoping analysis for the servicing income.
(e) Borrower non-payment and servicing advances. When borrowers do not make payments on a loan, stakeholders have expressed that servicing income may not be recorded yet in relation to that particular loan, and the lack of payment is reflected in the measurement of the MSR asset/liability. Meanwhile, servicing agreements may require the servicer to make payments (advances) to the loan owner or investors, during any period when the borrower does not make payments. Servicers often are entitled to recover those advances either from the borrower, loan owner or investor, or other third parties. The staff thinks that the existence of these arrangements does not affect the scoping analysis described above; however, entities may need to use judgment to consider whether revenue recognition of the servicing income is appropriate when the promised servicing inflows are not received from the borrower.
Expand Expand
Resize
Tools
Rcl

Welcome to Viewpoint, the new platform that replaces Inform. Once you have viewed this piece of content, to ensure you can access the content most relevant to you, please confirm your territory.

signin option menu option suggested option contentmouse option displaycontent option contentpage option relatedlink option prevandafter option trending option searchicon option search option feedback option end slide