The commitment fee incurred to obtain a line of credit  represents the benefit of being able to access capital over the contractual term, and therefore, meets the definition of an asset. Reporting entities should subsequently amortize the asset ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line of credit. Only in the limited circumstances when a reporting entity draws down on a line of credit and does not intend to repay the borrowing until the contractual maturity of the arrangement (i.e., the borrowing is treated like a term loan) do we believe the portion of the costs related to each respective draw down could be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the debt when drawn.

IFRS requires allocation between amounts that are expected to be drawn down and those that are not. To the extent there is evidence that it is probable that some or all of the facility will be drawn down, the commitment fee is allocated between the amounts that are expected to be drawn down and the amounts that are not expected to be drawn down. The fee related to the portion expected to be drawn down is accounted for as a transaction cost under IFRS 9 (i.e., the fee is deferred and deducted from the carrying value of the financial liabilities when the draw down occurs). The fee related to the portion not expected to be drawn down is capitalized as a prepayment for liquidity services and amortized over the period of the facility.