Search within this section
Select a section below and enter your search term, or to search all click IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences
Favorited Content
US GAAP |
IFRS |
The FASB staff concluded that temporary differences should be measured at regular statutory tax rates versus considering the impact of BEAT in determining the rate expected to apply. Therefore, the effects of BEAT should be recognized as a period cost when incurred versus being considered in the measurement of deferred taxes.
|
No specific guidance related to BEAT exists under IFRS. It would be acceptable for an entity to measure deferred taxes at the regular statutory tax rate and account for the effects of BEAT in the year in which they are incurred.
|
The FASB staff also concluded that an entity does not need to evaluate the effect of potentially paying the BEAT tax in future years on the realization of deferred tax assets. While not required, we believe that companies may elect to do so. |
There is no similar guidance under IFRS on the potential impact of BEAT on the realizability of deferred tax assets. |
US GAAP |
IFRS |
The FASB staff concluded that an entity that is subject to GILTI must make an accounting policy election to either treat GILTI as a period cost, or to record deferred taxes for basis differences that are expected to reverse as GILTI in future years. |
It would be acceptable to recognize any taxes for GILTI as a period cost when GILTI is included on the tax return. It would also be acceptable to reflect the impact of the GILTI inclusion in the tax rate used to measure deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI. Judgment will be required to determine which approach is more appropriate.
|
US GAAP |
IFRS |
We believe that FDII should be accounted for as a special deduction. Under US GAAP, special deductions are recognized in the period in which they are included in the tax return, instead of being reflected in the measurement of deferred taxes (refer to SD 8.9). |
IFRS does not address special deductions. It would be acceptable to recognize FDII in the period in which the deduction is included in the tax return. It might also be acceptable to reflect the impact in the measurement of deferred taxes on temporary differences that will be subject to FDII upon reversal. |
PwC. All rights reserved. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. Each member firm is a separate legal entity. Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors.
Select a section below and enter your search term, or to search all click IFRS and US GAAP: similarities and differences