The PCD asset accounting model is designed such that in many aspects, the subsequent measurement and presentation of the allowance for credit losses is consistent among similarly classified financial assets (e.g., receivables, loans, HTM securities, AFS debt securities) originated or acquired (but that do not qualify as PCD) by the reporting entity. Refer to
LI 7 for further information on subsequent measurement under the CECL model. Refer to
LI 8 for further information on subsequent measurement for the AFS model.
When an entity uses a non-DCF method under
ASC 326-20, the initial allowance for credit losses for PCD assets should be based on the asset’s unpaid principal balance and not its amortized cost basis. The initial allowance is then added to the asset’s “initial amortized cost basis” (e.g., purchase price). This is required by the guidance in
ASC 326-20-30-14 and was needed to avoid a potentially circular calculation in which the allowance is based on the collectibility of the amortized cost basis of an asset, but it also impacts the amortized cost basis through the PCD gross up. When subsequently measuring the allowance,
ASC 326-20-35-1 states that the method used to determine the allowance should generally be applied consistently over time. As such, the allowance on a PCD asset should be consistently based on the unpaid principal balance and not the amortized cost basis of the asset when using a non-DCF approach.
Subsequent changes in expected credit losses will follow either the CECL impairment model or the AFS debt security impairment model, whereby subsequent changes in expected credit losses are recognized as an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses recorded in net income (an increase to the allowance if credit losses increase and a release of the allowance if credit losses decrease) and not as an adjustment to investment yield recognition (with the possible exception of instruments subject to
ASC 325-40).
Example LI 9-4 addresses the subsequent measurement accounting for PCD loans
EXAMPLE LI 9-4
Accounting for PCD loans after initial recognition
Bank Corp purchases a loan with a par value of $100,000 for $83,000. The loan has experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination. Therefore, Bank Corp determines that the loan meets the definition of a PCD asset. At the date of acquisition, Bank Corp calculates an allowance for expected credit losses of $10,000.
At the end of the first reporting period subsequent to Bank Corp’s purchase of the loan, Bank Corp should recalculate the allowance for credit losses in accordance with the CECL model. Assume that as a result of an improving credit position of the borrower, Bank Corp determines the expected credit loss has declined from $10,000 to $7,000.
Bank Corp should account for this decrease in expected credit losses as it would for any other instrument subject to the CECL model. As a result, Bank Corp should decrease its allowance for expected credit losses with an offsetting entry to the income statement.
Dr. Allowance for expected credit losses
|
|
|
Note that the impact of the decrease in the expected credit loss is reported through net income even though the initial credit loss estimate was recognized as an adjustment to the amortized cost basis of the instrument and did not initially impact net income.