Q: Rule 135 speaks in terms of Section 5. For purposes of confidential treatment, what about the other types of transactions covered by Item 14 (e.g., sales of assets for cash and cash mergers)? Rule 135 does not take these types of transaction into account.
A: Rule 135 is used as a bright line test for purposes of ascertaining when public disclosure of information will preclude availability of confidential treatment for an Item 14 proxy statement. See Rule 14a-6(e)(2)(ii). The reference to Rule 135 does not limit the types of transactions for which confidential treatment is available. See the paragraph after fn. 80 in the adopting release.
Select a section below and enter your search term, or to search all click
C&DIs
✕
Welcome to Viewpoint, the new platform that replaces Inform. Once you have viewed this piece of content, to ensure you can access the content most relevant to you, please confirm your territory.
Viewpoint allows you to save up to 25 favorites.
Consider removing one of your current favorites in order to to add a new one.
Are you still working? Click here to extend your session to continue reading our licensed content, if not, you will be automatically logged off.
You are already signed in on another browser or device.
Click Continue if you want to automatically close other logged in sessions and continue. If you want to manually check for other active logged in sessions first, please select Cancel to go back to the previous page.