Search within this section
Select a section below and enter your search term, or to search all click Regulations Committee Minutes
Favorited Content
Highlights of the October 21, 2015 SEC Regulations Committee meeting
us SEC - Regulations Committee Highlights
SEC Regulations Committee
October 21, 2015 - Joint Meeting with SEC Staff
SEC Offices – Washington DC
October 21, 2015 - Joint Meeting with SEC Staff
SEC Offices – Washington DC
HIGHLIGHTS
NOTICE: The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) SEC Regulations Committee meets periodically with the staff of the SEC to discuss emerging financial reporting issues relating to SEC rules and regulations. The purpose of the following highlights is to summarize the issues discussed at the meetings. These highlights have not been considered or acted on by senior technical committees of the AICPA and do not represent an official position of the AICPA or the CAQ. As with all other documents issued by the CAQ, these highlights are not authoritative and users are urged to refer directly to applicable authoritative pronouncements for the text of the technical literature. These highlights do not purport to be applicable or sufficient to the circumstances of any work performed by practitioners. They are not intended to be a substitute for professional judgment applied by practitioners.
In addition, these highlights are not authoritative positions or interpretations issued by the SEC or its staff. The highlights were not transcribed by the SEC and have not been considered or acted upon by the SEC or its staff. Accordingly, these highlights do not constitute an official statement of the views of the Commission or of the staff of the Commission.
As available on this website, highlights of Joint Meetings of the SEC Regulations Committee and the SEC staff are not updated for the subsequent issuance of technical pronouncements or positions taken by the SEC staff, nor are they deleted when they are superseded by the issuance of subsequent highlights or authoritative accounting or auditing literature. As a result, the information, commentary or guidance contained herein may not be current or accurate and the CAQ is under no obligation to update such information. Readers are therefore urged to refer to current authoritative or source material.
I. ATTENDANCE
SEC Regulations Committee | Securities and Exchange Commission | Observers and Guests |
John May, Chair Christine Davine, Vice-Chair Brad Davidson Melanie Dolan Fred Frank Liz Gantnier Steven Jacobs Jeff Lenz | Division of Corporation Finance (Division)
Mark Kronforst, Chief Accountant Craig Olinger, Deputy Chief Accountant Nili Shah, Deputy Chief Accountant Patricia Armelin, Associate Chief Accountant Jessica Barberich, Associate Chief Accountant Jill Davis, Associate Chief Accountant* Louise Dorsey, Associate Chief Accountant* Todd Hardiman, Associate Chief Accountant Zachary Fallon, Special Counsel Cicely LaMothe, Associate Director Austin Lee, Valuation Fellow Joel Levine, Associate Chief Accountant Ryan Milne, Associate Chief Accountant Kyle Moffatt, Associate Director Robert Shapiro, CF-OCA Rotator Kevin Vaughn, Associate Chief Accountant Mark Green, Senior Special Counsel Angela Crane, Office Chief, Disclosure Standards James Allegretto, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant Jennifer Thompson, Branch Chief Office of the Chief Accountant
Wes Bricker, Deputy Chief Accountant Carlton Tartar, Associate Chief Accountant _______
* Via Teleconference | Annette Schumacher Barr, CAQ Observer Brian Schramm, PwC Kendra Decker, Grant Thornton |
II. Division of Corporation Finance personnel and organizational update
A. Personnel update
Nili Shah gave an update on the following personnel developments in the Division’s Office of the Chief Accountant (CF-OCA):
- Robert Shapiro joined the CF-OCA as a rotator.
- Shelly Luisi has been named as an Associate Director in the Division of Corporation Finance in the Disclosure Standards Office.
Wes Bricker noted that Jennifer Minke-Girard has been named Assistant Deputy Chief Accountant in the SEC’s Office of the Chief Accountant. In her new role, Ms. Minke-Girard will be responsible for consultations, communications and oversight of standard setting.
B. Division reorganization
At the Committee’s June Meeting, the staff noted that CF-OCA would be moving to a topical focus under which the Associate Chief Accountants will each be responsible for specific topical areas rather than being responsible for specific industries. The staff noted that inquiries and pre-clearance letters should still be directed to the CF- OCA’s general mailbox at DCAOLetters@sec.gov.
C. Merger of Financial Services AD Groups
The staff noted that the two review groups responsible for financial services companies (AD Groups 7 and 12) were merged into a single review Group. The combined group will be led by Assistant Director Dieter King and Senior Assistant Chief Accountants John Nolan and Stephanie Sullivan. The review group will still perform continuous reviews of the large banks.
III. Current financial reporting matters
A. Regulation A update
Zachary Fallon provided an update on Regulation A. Mr. Fallon noted that since the amendments to Regulation A became effective on June 19, 2015, there have been 32 public Regulation A offering statements, 15 of which were Tier 1 and 17 Tier 2. Additionally, he noted his office has seen 14 draft offering statements for issuers that have not previously sold securities pursuant to a qualified offering statement under Regulation A. The 14 draft offering statement submissions included 5 Tier 1 and 9 Tier 2.
Mr. Fallon added that on June 23, 2015, the Commission issued CDI 182.07 which affirmed the Commission’s position that Regulation A filings can be utilized for business combination transactions, such as a merger or acquisition.
B. Revenue Recognition
In 2014, the FASB and the IASB each issued a new accounting standard, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09 and IFRS 15, respectively), intended to improve and converge the financial reporting requirements for revenue from contracts with customers. Members of the Committee and staff discussed the following questions relating to implementation of the new guidance:
1. Impact of retrospective adoption on significance testing under Rules 3-09 and 4-08(g) of Regulation S-X
The staff is considering how its current guidance might be modified to address the concerns articulated by members of the Committee.
[Note:
Subsequent to the meeting, the staff discussed this topic at the 2015 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments. Craig Olinger indicated that the staff plans to provide guidance that would allow companies adopting the new revenue standard retrospectively to use their pre- transition significance tests for evaluating the applicability of Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X for periods that precede the date of adoption of the new standard. Although Mr. Olinger did not specifically reference Rule 4-08(g), it is expected the guidance will be applicable to that rule as well.]2. Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
Consistent with existing guidance regarding the application of the new standard to the selected financial data table, the staff noted they would not object to applying the new revenue standard retrospectively for the same years as presented in the registrant’s primary financial statements in connection with the preparation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements when full retrospective adoption is applied. The staff indicated that registrants should clearly disclose that earlier years are not adjusted.
3. Interaction of retrospective adoption and the requirements to revise previously issued financial statements in connection with certain SEC filings.
Item 11(b) of Form S-3 requires retrospective revision of pre-transition financial statements to reflect a change in accounting principle (for which retrospective application was either required or elected) if the Form S-3 also incorporates by reference interim financial statements prepared under the new principle.
C. Interaction between ASU 2014-17 (Push Down Accounting) and the presentation/computation guidance in Rule 3-10(i) of Regulation S-X, SAB Topic 6-K, and SAB Topic 1-J
The Committee and the staff discussed the impact of ASU 2014-17 (and the rescission of SAB Topic 5-J) on the references to push-down accounting in Rule 3- 10(i) and SAB Topics 1-J and 6-K. Regarding Rule 3-10(i), the staff indicated that condensed consolidating information for subsidiaries that prepare separate financial statements should be consistent, meaning if push down accounting is applied in separate subsidiary financial statements under GAAP then that accounting basis should be utilized in connection with Rule 3-10(i). The staff also indicated that registrants should continue to apply pushdown accounting with respect to change-in- control events for which pushdown accounting had been reflected previously in the condensed consolidating financial information.
- Regarding SAB Topic 1:J, the staff indicated that the guidance in FRM 2070.4(A) and 2070.6(A) continues to be applicable, meaning the numerator should give effect to any new cost basis arising from acquisition accounting irrespective of whether pushdown accounting is applied.
- Regarding SAB Topic 6:K.2, the staff noted that questions regarding the restricted net assets test have been rare, and declined to answer absent a live fact pattern.
D. FRM Section 3420, Distributions to promoters/owners at or prior to closing of an IPO
The staff and members of the Committee discussed the guidance in FRM 3420 including how the pro-forma Earnings Per Share (EPS) metric is calculated and used and how that information interacts with pro forma EPS presentations prepared under Article 11 of Regulation S-X. Members of the Committee expressed that there was confusion in practice about the calculation of this measure and it wasn’t clear whether investors use the information. The staff mentioned they were going to continue to evaluate this guidance.
IV. Current practice issues
A. Shelf take downs and greater than 50% completed and probable business acquisitions
The Committee asked the staff to confirm that the guidance in FRM 2045.3 and 2050.3, which indicates that financial statements of an acquired business that is greater than 50% significant are required to be filed prior to offering securities pursuant to an effective registration statement (except in certain limited types of offerings specified in FRM 2050.3), does not apply to a probable business acquisition unless management determines that the probable business acquisition constitutes a fundamental change. The staff confirmed that the “bright line” guidance only applies to completed acquisitions.
Copyright by Center for Audit Quality
Link copied
