Expand
Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-05
August 2023
Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60)
Recognition and Initial Measurement
An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® is the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. An Accounting Standards Update is not authoritative; rather, it is a document that communicates how the Accounting Standards Codification is being amended. It also provides other information to help a user of GAAP understand how and why GAAP is changing and when the changes will be effective.
Copyright © 2023 by Financial Accounting Foundation. All rights reserved. Certain portions may include material copyrighted by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Content copyrighted by Financial Accounting Foundation, or any third parties who have not provided specific permission, may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Financial Accounting Foundation or such applicable third party. Financial Accounting Foundation claims no copyright in any portion hereof that constitutes a work of the United States Government.

Summary

Why Is the FASB Issuing This Accounting Standards Update (Update)?
The amendments in this Update address the accounting for contributions made to a joint venture, upon formation, in a joint venture’s separate financial statements. The objectives of the amendments are to (1) provide decision-useful information to investors and other allocators of capital (collectively, investors) in a joint venture’s financial statements and (2) reduce diversity in practice.
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) do not provide specific authoritative guidance on how a joint venture, upon formation, should recognize and initially measure assets contributed and liabilities assumed (including the assets and liabilities of businesses contributed). Rather, GAAP explicitly provides that transactions between a corporate joint venture and its owners are outside the scope of Topic 845, Nonmonetary Transactions, and that the formation of a joint venture is outside the scope of Topic 805, Business Combinations. In the absence of specific guidance, practice has been influenced by various sources, including speeches given by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff. As a result, there is diversity in practice in how a joint venture accounts for the contributions it receives upon formation—some joint ventures initially measure their net assets at fair value at the formation date, while other joint ventures initially measure their net assets at the venturers’ carrying amounts.
To reduce diversity in practice and provide decision-useful information to a joint venture’s investors, the Board decided to require that a joint venture apply a new basis of accounting upon formation. By applying a new basis of accounting, a joint venture, upon formation, will recognize and initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value (with exceptions to fair value measurement that are consistent with the business combinations guidance).
The amendments in this Update do not amend the definition of a joint venture (or a corporate joint venture), the accounting by an equity method investor for its investment in a joint venture, or the accounting by a joint venture for contributions received after its formation.
Who Is Affected by the Amendments in This Update?
The amendments in this Update affect the accounting for contributions received upon formation by entities that meet the definition of a joint venture or a corporate joint venture, as defined in the Master Glossary of the Codification. Additionally, existing joint ventures have the option to apply the guidance retrospectively.
What Are the Main Provisions, How Do the Main Provisions Differ from Current Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and Why Are They an Improvement?
Requiring a joint venture to recognize and initially measure its assets and liabilities using a new basis of accounting upon formation reduces diversity in practice and provides decision-useful information to a joint venture’s investors.
Because the Codification does not contain specific guidance for the accounting by a joint venture for net assets contributed upon formation, there is diversity in practice. Stakeholders observed that, before the amendments in this Update were issued, a joint venture may recognize and initially measure its net assets upon formation at the carrying amounts of the venturer that contributed those net assets, and, in certain circumstances, a joint venture may recognize and initially measure its net assets at fair value upon formation.
Feedback from practitioners indicated that (1) there is a lack of guidance for the accounting by a joint venture and (2) the factors used by the joint venture to determine when its net assets should be recognized and initially measured at fair value are nonauthoritative and outdated. Generally, practitioners supported requiring that a joint venture initially measure the contributions at fair value upon formation, citing that they view the formation of the joint venture as a change in control of the contributed net assets that should result in a new basis of accounting.
Feedback from preparers indicated that the venturers are usually, but not always, the primary users of a joint venture’s financial statements. Feedback from preparers generally supported fair value measurement, observing that fair value (1) is more relevant than the venturers’ carrying amounts of the contributed net assets at the formation date and (2) would reduce equity method basis differences (any difference between the venturer’s cost of its investment in a joint venture and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of the joint venture).
In response to the feedback received, the Board decided to require that a joint venture, upon formation, apply a new basis of accounting. As a result, a newly formed joint venture should initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value (with exceptions to fair value measurement that are consistent with the business combinations guidance). That approach is generally consistent with other new basis of accounting models in GAAP, such as fresh-start reporting in accordance with Topic 852, Reorganizations. It is also broadly consistent with the accounting outcome that would result from treating the joint venture as the acquirer of a business within the scope of Subtopic 805-10, Business Combinations—Overall. The amendments in this Update require that a joint venture apply the following key adaptations from the business combinations guidance upon formation:
  1. A joint venture is the formation of a new entity without an accounting acquirer. The formation of a joint venture is the creation of a new reporting entity, and none of the assets and/or businesses contributed to the joint venture are viewed as having survived the combination as an independent entity—that is, an accounting acquirer will not be identified.
  2. A joint venture measures its identifiable net assets and goodwill, if any, at the formation date. The joint venture formation date is the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture.
  3. Initial measurement of a joint venture’s total net assets is equal to the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture’s equity. The amendments require that a joint venture measure its total net assets upon formation as the fair value of the joint venture as a whole. The fair value of the joint venture as a whole equals the fair value of 100 percent of a joint venture’s equity immediately following formation (including any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture).
  4. A joint venture provides relevant disclosures. The purpose of the disclosures is to help a user of a joint venture’s financial statements understand the nature and financial effect of the joint venture formation in the period in which the formation date occurs. Joint venture disclosure requirements upon formation are different from the requirements for business combinations.

The amendments in this Update permit a joint venture to apply the measurement period guidance in Subtopic 805-10 if the initial accounting for a joint venture formation is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the formation occurs.
Many of the amendments in this Update, other than the addition of Subtopic 805-60, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations, are clarifying or conforming amendments.
When Will the Amendments Be Effective and What Are the Transition Requirements?
The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for all joint venture formations with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025.
Additionally, a joint venture that was formed before January 1, 2025 may elect to apply the amendments retrospectively if it has sufficient information. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period in which financial statements have not yet been issued (or made available for issuance), either prospectively or retrospectively.

Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification®

Introduction
1. The Accounting Standards Codification is amended as described in paragraphs 2–50. In some cases, to put the change in context, not only are the amended paragraphs shown but also the preceding and following paragraphs. Terms from the Master Glossary are in bold type. Added text is underlined, and deleted text is
struck out
.

Amendments to Master Glossary

2. Amend the Master Glossary term Goodwill, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Goodwill
An asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a
business combination
or an
acquisition by a not-for-profit entity
business combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are not individually identified and separately recognized. For ease of reference, this term also includes the immediate charge recognized by not-for-profit entities in accordance with paragraph 958-805-25-29.
3. Add the new Master Glossary term Formation Date, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Formation Date
The formation date of a joint venture is the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture, which is not necessarily the legal entity formation date. The formation date is the measurement date for the formation transaction. If multiple arrangements are accounted for as a single transaction that establishes the formation of a joint venture, the formation date is the measurement date for all arrangements that form part of the single formation transaction.
4. Add the Master Glossary term Joint Venture to Subtopics 205-10, 205-20, 350-10, 350-20, 350-30, 450-10, 718-10, 730-10, 740-10, 805-10, 805-20, 805-50, 810-10, 815-10, 842-10, 842-20, 842-50, and 985-20 as follows:
Joint Venture
An entity owned and operated by a small group of businesses (the joint venturers) as a separate and specific business or project for the mutual benefit of the members of the group. A government may also be a member of the group. The purpose of a joint venture frequently is to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product, or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities. A joint venture also usually provides an arrangement under which each joint venturer may participate, directly or indirectly, in the overall management of the joint venture. Joint venturers thus have an interest or relationship other than as passive investors. An entity that is a subsidiary of one of the joint venturers is not a joint venture. The ownership of a joint venture seldom changes, and its equity interests usually are not traded publicly. A minority public ownership, however, does not preclude an entity from being a joint venture. As distinguished from a corporate joint venture, a joint venture is not limited to corporate entities.

Addition of Subtopic 805-60

5. Add Subtopic 805-60, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
[For ease of readability, the new Subtopic is not underlined.]
Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations
Overview and Background
General
805-60-05-1 This Subtopic provides guidance on the accounting and reporting for the formation of a joint venture or a corporate joint venture (collectively, joint ventures) in a joint venture’s separate financial statements.
805-60-05-2 Paragraph 805-60-25-2 requires that a joint venture account for its formation by applying a new basis of accounting. In accounting for the formation of a joint venture, none of the assets and/or businesses contributed to the joint venture are viewed as having survived the combination as independent entities. Rather, the formation is viewed as the transfer of the net assets to a new entity that assumes {add glossary link to 3 rddefinition}control{add glossary link to 3 rddefinition} over them. The history of that new reporting entity begins with the joint venture formation. A joint venture establishes a new basis of accounting upon formation by applying aspects of the acquisition method for business combinations, with adaptations that are unique to joint ventures as described in this Subtopic. Accounting for a joint venture formation includes the following steps:
  1. Determining the formation date
  2. Recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets, the liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture
  3. Recognizing and measuring goodwill, if any, using the {add glossary link to 2 nd definition}fair value{add glossary link to 2 nd definition} of the joint venture as a whole immediately following formation.

Scope and Scope Exceptions
General
> Overall Guidance
805-60-15-1 This Subtopic has its own discrete scope, which is separate and distinct from the pervasive scope for this Topic as outlined in Section 805-10-15.
> Entities
805-60-15-2 The guidance in this Subtopic applies to the financial statements of joint venture and corporate joint venture entities (collectively, joint ventures) as defined in Section 805-60-20.
> Transactions
805-60-15-3 The guidance in this Subtopic applies to the formation of joint ventures.
805-60-15-4 The guidance in this Subtopic does not apply to any of the following:
  1. Transactions between a joint venture and its owners other than the formation of a joint venture
  2. Formations of entities determined to be not-for-profit entities in accordance with Topic 958
  3. Combinations between entities, businesses, or nonprofit activities under common control (see paragraph 805-50-15-6 for examples)
  4. Entities in the construction or extractive industries that may be proportionately consolidated by any of their investor-venturers in accordance with paragraph 810-10-45-14
  5. Collaborative arrangements within the scope of Topic 808, except for any part of the arrangement that is conducted in a separate legal entity that meets the definition of a joint venture.

Glossary
Acquiree
The business or businesses that the acquirer obtains control of in a business combination. This term also includes a nonprofit activity or business that a not-for-profit acquirer obtains control of in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity.
Acquirer
The entity that obtains control of the acquiree. However, in a business combination in which a variable interest entity (VIE) is acquired, the primary beneficiary of that entity always is the acquirer.
Acquisition by a Not-for-Profit Entity
A transaction or other event in which a not-for-profit acquirer obtains control of one or more nonprofit activities or businesses and initially recognizes their assets and liabilities in the acquirer’s financial statements. When applicable guidance in Topic 805 is applied by a not-for-profit entity, the term business combination has the same meaning as this term has for a for-profit entity. Likewise, a reference to business combinations in guidance that links to Topic 805 has the same meaning as a reference to acquisitions by not-for-profit entities.
Acquisition Date
The date on which the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree.
Business
Paragraphs 805-10-55-3A through 55-6 and 805-10-55-8 through 55-9 define what is considered a business.
Business Combination
A transaction or other event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses. Transactions sometimes referred to as true mergers or mergers of equals also are business combinations. See also Acquisition by a Not-for-Profit Entity.
Control (third definition)
The same as the meaning of controlling financial interest in paragraph 810-10-15-8.
Corporate Joint Venture
A corporation owned and operated by a small group of entities (the joint venturers) as a separate and specific business or project for the mutual benefit of the members of the group. A government may also be a member of the group. The purpose of a corporate joint venture frequently is to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities. A corporate joint venture also usually provides an arrangement under which each joint venturer may participate, directly or indirectly, in the overall management of the joint venture. Joint venturers thus have an interest or relationship other than as passive investors. An entity that is a subsidiary of one of the joint venturers is not a corporate joint venture. The ownership of a corporate joint venture seldom changes, and its stock is usually not traded publicly. A noncontrolling interest held by public ownership, however, does not preclude a corporation from being a corporate joint venture.
Equity Interests
Used broadly to mean ownership interests of investor-owned entities; owner, member, or participant interests of mutual entities; and owner or member interests in the net assets of not-for-profit entities.
Fair Value (second definition)
The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Financial Asset
Cash, evidence of an ownership interest in an entity, or a contract that conveys to one entity a right to do either of the following:
  1. Receive cash or another financial instrument from a second entity
  2. Exchange other financial instruments on potentially favorable terms with the second entity.

Formation Date
The formation date of a joint venture is the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture, which is not necessarily the legal entity formation date. The formation date is the measurement date for the formation transaction. If multiple arrangements are accounted for as a single transaction that establishes the formation of a joint venture, the formation date is the measurement date for all arrangements that form part of the single formation transaction.
Goodwill
An asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are not individually identified and separately recognized. For ease of reference, this term also includes the immediate charge recognized by not-for-profit entities in accordance with paragraph 958-805-25-29.
Identifiable
An asset is identifiable if it meets either of the following criteria:
  1. It is separable, that is, capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, either individually or together with a related contract, identifiable asset, or liability, regardless of whether the entity intends to do so.
  2. It arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations.

Intangible Assets
Assets (not including financial assets) that lack physical substance. (The term intangible assets is used to refer to intangible assets other than goodwill.)
Joint Venture
An entity owned and operated by a small group of businesses (the joint venturers) as a separate and specific business or project for the mutual benefit of the members of the group. A government may also be a member of the group. The purpose of a joint venture frequently is to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product, or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities. A joint venture also usually provides an arrangement under which each joint venturer may participate, directly or indirectly, in the overall management of the joint venture. Joint venturers thus have an interest or relationship other than as passive investors. An entity that is a subsidiary of one of the joint venturers is not a joint venture. The ownership of a joint venture seldom changes, and its equity interests usually are not traded publicly. A minority public ownership, however, does not preclude an entity from being a joint venture. As distinguished from a corporate joint venture, a joint venture is not limited to corporate entities.
Legal Entity
Any legal structure used to conduct activities or to hold assets. Some examples of such structures are corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, grantor trusts, and other trusts.
Market Participants
Buyers and sellers in the principal (or most advantageous) market for the asset or liability that have all of the following characteristics:
  1. They are independent of each other, that is, they are not related parties, although the price in a related-party transaction may be used as an input to a fair value measurement if the reporting entity has evidence that the transaction was entered into at market terms
  2. They are knowledgeable, having a reasonable understanding about the asset or liability and the transaction using all available information, including information that might be obtained through due diligence efforts that are usual and customary
  3. They are able to enter into a transaction for the asset or liability
  4. They are willing to enter into a transaction for the asset or liability, that is, they are motivated but not forced or otherwise compelled to do so.

Noncontrolling Interest
The portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. A noncontrolling interest is sometimes called a minority interest.
Nonprofit Activity
An integrated set of activities and assets that is capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing benefits, other than goods or services at a profit or profit equivalent, as a fulfillment of an entity’s purpose or mission (for example, goods or services to beneficiaries, customers, or members). As with a not-for-profit entity, a nonprofit activity possesses characteristics that distinguish it from a business or a for-profit business entity.
Not-for-Profit Entity
An entity that possesses the following characteristics, in varying degrees, that distinguish it from a business entity:
  1. Contributions of significant amounts of resources from resource providers who do not expect commensurate or proportionate pecuniary return
  2. Operating purposes other than to provide goods or services at a profit
  3. Absence of ownership interests like those of business entities.

Entities that clearly fall outside this definition include the following:
  1. All investor-owned entities
  2. Entities that provide dividends, lower costs, or other economic benefits directly and proportionately to their owners, members, or participants, such as mutual insurance entities, credit unions, farm and rural electric cooperatives, and employee benefit plans.

Orderly Transaction
A transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities; it is not a forced transaction (for example, a forced liquidation or distress sale).
Owners
Used broadly to include holders of ownership interests (equity interests) of investor-owned entities, mutual entities, or not-for-profit entities. Owners include shareholders, partners, proprietors, or members or participants of mutual entities. Owners also include owner and member interests in the net assets of not-for-profit entities.
Private Company
An entity other than a public business entity, a not-for-profit entity, or an employee benefit plan within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting.
Public Business Entity
A public business entity is a business entity meeting any one of the criteria below. Neither a not-for-profit entity nor an employee benefit plan is a business entity.
  1. It is required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to file or furnish financial statements, or does file or furnish financial statements (including voluntary filers), with the SEC (including other entities whose financial statements or financial information are required to be or are included in a filing).
  2. It is required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act), as amended, or rules or regulations promulgated under the Act, to file or furnish financial statements with a regulatory agency other than the SEC.
  3. It is required to file or furnish financial statements with a foreign or domestic regulatory agency in preparation for the sale of or for purposes of issuing securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer.
  4. It has issued, or is a conduit bond obligor for, securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an over-the-counter market.
  5. It has one or more securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer, and it is required by law, contract, or regulation to prepare U.S. GAAP financial statements (including notes) and make them publicly available on a periodic basis (for example, interim or annual periods). An entity must meet both of these conditions to meet this criterion.

An entity may meet the definition of a public business entity solely because its financial statements or financial information is included in another entity’s filing with the SEC. In that case, the entity is only a public business entity for purposes of financial statements that are filed or furnished with the SEC.
Related Parties
Related parties include:
  1. Affiliates of the entity
  2. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825-10-15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity
  3. Trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management
  4. Principal owners of the entity and members of their immediate families
  5. Management of the entity and members of their immediate families
  6. Other parties with which the entity may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests
  7. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Security (second definition)
A share, participation, or other interest in property or in an entity of the issuer or an obligation of the issuer that has all of the following characteristics:
  1. It is either represented by an instrument issued in bearer or registered form or, if not represented by an instrument, is registered in books maintained to record transfers by or on behalf of the issuer.
  2. It is of a type commonly dealt in on securities exchanges or markets or, when represented by an instrument, is commonly recognized in any area in which it is issued or dealt in as a medium for investment.
  3. It either is one of a class or series or by its terms is divisible into a class or series of shares, participations, interests, or obligations.

Variable Interest Entity
A legal entity subject to consolidation according to the provisions of the Variable Interest Entities Subsections of Subtopic 810-10.
Recognition
General
805-60-25-1 An entity shall determine whether a transaction or an event is a joint venture formation by applying the definition of joint venture (or corporate joint venture) and the guidance in paragraph 805-60-25-3 on its formation date. If the transaction or event is not a joint venture formation, the reporting entity shall account for the transaction or event in accordance with other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
805-60-25-2 Accounting for joint venture formations as described in this Subtopic requires that a joint venture establish upon formation a new basis of accounting for its assets and liabilities in accordance with Subtopic 805-20 on identifiable assets and liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest. A joint venture shall recognize goodwill, if any, in accordance with paragraph 805-60-25-13. Unlike the acquisition method, accounting for the formation of a joint venture does not include the identification of an acquirer. This Section includes the following requirements:
  1. Determining the formation date
  2. Determining whether multiple arrangements should be accounted for as a single formation transaction
  3. Determining what is part of the joint venture formation
  4. Accounting for the formation of a joint venture, as applicable:
    1. New basis of accounting
    2. Private company accounting alternatives
    3. Goodwill
    4. Measurement period
    5. Transfers of financial assets.

> Determining the Formation Date
805-60-25-3 The joint venture formation date is the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture, which is not necessarily the legal entity formation date. A joint venture’s formation date is the measurement date for the formation transaction. A joint venture shall determine a single formation date and account for its formation as of that date. A joint venture shall consider the pertinent facts and circumstances in identifying its formation date. All contributions received, or that are receivable, as of the formation date, including consideration of the guidance in paragraphs 805-60-25-4 through 25-5 on multiple arrangements that should be accounted for as a single formation transaction, constitute the joint venture formation transaction.
> Determining Whether Multiple Arrangements Should Be Accounted for as a Single Formation Transaction
805-60-25-4 Multiple arrangements may establish the formation of a joint venture and constitute the joint venture formation transaction. Circumstances sometimes indicate that the multiple arrangements should be accounted for as a single transaction. In determining whether to account for the multiple arrangements as a single transaction that establishes the formation, a joint venture shall consider the terms and conditions of the arrangements and their economic effects. Any of the following may indicate that the joint venture should account for the multiple arrangements as a single transaction that established the formation of the joint venture:
  1. The multiple arrangements are entered into at the same time or in contemplation of one another.
  2. The multiple arrangements form a single transaction designed to achieve an overall commercial effect.
  3. The occurrence of one arrangement is dependent on the occurrence of at least one other arrangement.
  4. One arrangement considered on its own is not economically justified, but the multiple arrangements are economically justified when considered together.

805-60-25-5 If multiple arrangements are accounted for as a single transaction in accordance with paragraph 805-60-25-4, then the formation date shall be the measurement date for all arrangements that form part of the single formation transaction. A joint venture shall recognize identifiable assets and liabilities that are part of that single transaction when they satisfy the recognition criteria described in paragraph 805-60-25-2.
> Determining What Is Part of the Joint Venture Formation
805-60-25-6 A joint venture and its owners (the venturers) may enter into an arrangement upon formation that is separate from the formation of the joint venture. For example, a joint venture may enter into an arrangement with a venturer to compensate the venturer or others (such as employees of the venturers) for future services. A joint venture shall apply the guidance in paragraphs 805-10-55-24 through 55-26 when determining whether a transaction involving payments to be made by the joint venture to the venturers or others is separate from or part of a joint venture formation. A joint venture shall identify any amounts that are separate from the formation of the joint venture and shall recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities that are determined to be part of the joint venture formation. Separate transactions shall be accounted for in accordance with other relevant GAAP.
805-60-25-7 A joint venture shall not apply by analogy the guidance in paragraphs 805-10-55-20 through 55-23 (for a transaction that in effect settles preexisting relationships between the acquirer and the acquiree) or paragraph 805-10-25-23 (for acquisition-related costs and transactions that reimburse the acquiree or its former owners for paying the acquirer’s acquisition-related costs).
805-60-25-8 If, upon formation, a joint venture issues share-based payment awards to replace awards held by grantees of the contributed entities, then the joint venture shall apply the guidance in paragraphs 805-30-30-9 through 30-13 to allocate the fair-value-based measure of replacement share-based payment awards between preformation vesting and postformation compensation cost. Paragraphs 805-60-55-2 through 55-14 provide illustrations of the accounting for the issuance of replacement share-based payment awards in a joint venture formation.
805-60-25-9 For the purposes of applying the business combinations guidance on arrangements that include contingent payments to employees or selling shareholders and replacement share-based payment awards referenced in paragraphs 805-60-25-6 through 25-8:
  1. The joint venture shall be viewed as analogous to the acquirer in a business combination.
  2. The venturers shall be viewed as analogous to the selling shareholders.
  3. The recognized businesses and/or assets shall be viewed as analogous to an acquiree.

> Accounting for the Formation of a Joint Venture
• > New Basis of Accounting
805-60-25-10 At the formation date, a joint venture shall account for its formation by establishing a new basis of accounting for its identifiable assets and liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest, in accordance with Subtopic 805-20.
805-60-25-11 A joint venture shall account for its formation in accordance with this Subtopic regardless of whether the assets or group of assets recognized by the joint venture constitute a business in accordance with Subtopic 805-10.
• > Private Company Accounting Alternatives
805-60-25-12 A joint venture that is a private company may elect to apply the accounting alternative for the recognition of identifiable intangible assets described in paragraphs 805-20-25-30 through 25-33. In accordance with paragraph 805-20-15-4, a joint venture that elects to apply this accounting alternative must adopt the accounting alternative for amortizing goodwill in the Accounting Alternatives Subsections of Subtopic 350-20.
• > Goodwill
805-60-25-13 In accounting for its formation, a joint venture shall recognize goodwill as of the formation date, when applicable. The presence of more than an insignificant amount of goodwill is expected to be unusual if, at formation, the assets or group of assets recognized by the joint venture do not constitute a business in accordance with Subtopic 805-10. Paragraph 805-60-30-2 describes how a joint venture should measure goodwill upon its formation.
• > Measurement Period
805-60-25-14 If the initial accounting for a joint venture formation is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the formation date occurs, the joint venture may apply the measurement period guidance in paragraphs 805-10-25-13 through 25-19 for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. Joint ventures that apply the measurement period guidance shall disclose the information described in paragraph 805-60-50-3.
• > Transfers of Financial Assets
805-60-25-15 If a venturer transfers financial assets that are within the scope of Subtopic 860-10 to the joint venture upon formation, then the joint venture shall determine whether the transfer results in the recognition of the transferred financial assets by the joint venture by applying the guidance in Subtopic 860-10.
Initial Measurement
General
> Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest
805-60-30-1 A joint venture shall measure its identifiable assets and liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest, recognized at the formation date in accordance with Subtopic 805-20.
> Goodwill
805-60-30-2 A joint venture shall apply the guidance in this paragraph to measure goodwill, when applicable. A joint venture shall recognize goodwill, if any, upon formation, measured as the excess of (a) over (b):
  1. The formation-date {add glossary link to 2 nddefinition}fair value{add glossary link to 2 nddefinition} of the joint venture as a whole. The formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole shall equal the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture’s equity (net assets) immediately following formation (including any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture).
  2. The net of the formation-date amounts of the identifiable assets and liabilities recognized by the joint venture and measured in accordance with Subtopic 805-20.

805-60-30-3 Upon formation, a joint venture shall recognize the amount of its identifiable net assets recognized in excess of the fair value of the joint venture as a whole, if any, as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital (or other similar equity account, such as members’ equity).
> Instruments, Contracts, and Share-Based Payment Awards Classified as Equity
805-60-30-4 The amount of any separately recognized equity-classified instruments or contracts issued by a joint venture as part of the formation transaction, other than equity-classified replacement share-based payment awards (see paragraph 805-60-30-5), shall be accounted for as a reallocation of additional paid-in capital (or other similar equity account, such as members’ equity) and shall not affect the total amount of equity or goodwill recognized by the joint venture upon formation.
805-60-30-5 A joint venture shall initially measure equity-classified replacement share-based payment awards at the fair-value-based measurement method described in Topic 718 on stock compensation. The fair-value-based amount allocated to preformation vesting (in accordance with paragraph 805-60-25-8) of any replacement share-based payments classified as equity shall be recognized as a reallocation of additional paid-in capital (or other similar equity account, such as members’ equity) and shall not affect the total amount of equity or goodwill recognized by the joint venture upon formation.
> Liability-Classified and Asset-Classified Contingent Payments and Replacement Share-Based Payment Awards
805-60-30-6 A joint venture shall initially measure any contingent payment arrangements between the joint venture and its venturers that are classified as liabilities (or assets), other than replacement share-based payment awards, in accordance with paragraph 805-60-30-1. A joint venture shall not account for those arrangements generated as a result of the joint venture formation as contingent consideration or as an assumed contingent consideration arrangement.
805-60-30-7 A joint venture shall initially measure liability-classified replacement share-based payment awards using the fair-value-based measurement method described in Topic 718 on stock compensation (consistent with the requirements in paragraphs 805-60-25-8 and 805-60-30-1).
Subsequent Measurement
General
805-60-35-1 A joint venture shall subsequently measure and account for the assets and liabilities recognized upon formation in accordance with the requirements for acquirers of a business in Sections 805-10-35, 805-20-35, and 805-30-35, and other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), as applicable.
805-60-35-2 A joint venture that is a private company may elect to apply the accounting alternatives for the subsequent measurement of goodwill described in paragraphs 350-20-35-62 through 35-82.
Other Presentation Matters
General
> Disclosure of Formation Date Balance Sheet
805-60-45-1 To satisfy the requirements in paragraph 805-60-50-2(e), a joint venture may, in lieu of disclosure in the notes to financial statements, present a statement of financial position as of the formation date that reflects the amounts recognized by the joint venture for each major class of assets and liabilities as a result of its formation.
Disclosure
General
805-60-50-1 A joint venture shall disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to understand the nature and financial effect of the joint venture formation in the period in which the formation date occurs.
805-60-50-2 In the period of formation, a joint venture shall disclose the following:
  1. The formation date
  2. A description of the purpose for which the joint venture was formed (for example, to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product, or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities)
  3. The formation-date {add glossary link to 2 nddefinition}fair value{add glossary link to 2 nddefinition} of the joint venture as a whole
  4. A description of the assets and liabilities recognized by the joint venture at the formation date
  5. The amounts recognized by the joint venture for each major class of assets and liabilities as a result of accounting for its formation, either presented on the face of financial statements or disclosed in the notes to financial statements (see paragraph 805-60-45-1)
  6. A qualitative description of the factors that make up any goodwill recognized, such as expected synergies from combining operations of the contributed assets or businesses, intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, or other factors.

805-60-50-3 If the initial accounting for a joint venture formation is incomplete (see paragraph 805-60-25-14) for particular assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, or the formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole and the amounts recognized in the financial statements for the joint venture formation thus have been determined only provisionally, the joint venture shall disclose the following information:
  1. The reasons why the initial accounting is incomplete
  2. The assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, or the formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole for which the initial accounting is incomplete
  3. The nature and amount of any measurement period adjustments recognized during the reporting period, including separately the amount of adjustment to current-period income statement line items relating to the income effects that would have been recognized in previous periods if the adjustment to provisional amounts was recognized as of the formation date.

Implementation Guidance and Illustrations
General
805-60-55-1 This Section is an integral part of the requirements of this Subtopic. This Section provides illustrations that address the general application of accounting requirements for joint venture formations.
> Illustrations
• > Example 1: Joint Venture Replacement Share-Based Payment Employee Awards
805-60-55-2 On January 1, 20X0, a newly formed corporation with no assets or liabilities, New Venture, receives contributions of a controlling financial interest in Business A (90 percent voting interest) from Venturer 1 and Business B (100 percent voting interest) from Venturer 2 and, in exchange, issues 50 common shares to each Venturer 1 and Venturer 2. Assume that New Venture has no other classes of equity or any other equity instruments outstanding before receiving the contributions. It is determined that New Venture first met the definition of a joint venture on January 1, 20X0. New Venture determines January 1, 20X0, to be its formation date.
805-60-55-3 In accordance with paragraph 805-60-30-2, but before consideration of any liabilities for share-based payments, New Venture determines that the {add glossary link to 2nddefinition}fair value{add glossary link to 2nddefinition} of the joint venture as a whole is $100 million including a noncontrolling interest (10 percent voting interest) in Business A that is owned by an outside entity. It also determines, in accordance with paragraph 805-60-30-2, that the formation-date fair value of the identifiable assets is $120 million, the fair value of the liabilities is $40 million, and the fair value of the noncontrolling interest in Business A is $5 million.
805-60-55-4 Upon formation, New Venture exchanges replacement awards that require one year of postformation vesting for share-based payment awards of Business A for which employees had not yet rendered all of the required services as of the formation date. The fair-value-based measure of both awards (the original awards and the replacement awards) is $20 million at the formation date. When originally granted, the awards of the contributed business had a requisite service period of four years. As of the formation date, the contributed business’s employees had rendered two years’ service, and they would have been required to render two additional years of service after the formation date for their awards to vest. Accordingly, only a portion of the contributed business’s awards is attributable to preformation vesting.
805-60-55-5 The replacement awards require only one year of postformation vesting. Because employees have already rendered two years of service, the total requisite service period is three years. For simplicity, assume that New Venture estimates that there will be no forfeitures of the replacement share-based payment awards. The portion attributable to preformation vesting equals the fair-value-based measure of the contributed business’s award ($20 million) multiplied by the ratio of the preformation vesting period (2 years) to the greater of the total service period (3 years) and the original service period of the contributed business’s award (4 years). Thus, $10 million ($20 million × 2 ÷ 4 years) is attributable to preformation vesting and, therefore, New Venture’s additional paid-in capital upon formation. The remaining $10 million is attributable to postformation vesting and therefore recognized as compensation cost in New Venture’s postformation financial statements in accordance with Topic 718 on stock compensation.
805-60-55-6 New Venture applies the guidance in Topic 718 to determine whether the share-based payments should be classified as liabilities or equity.
• • > Case A: Joint Venture Replacement Share-Based Payment Employee Awards Are Liability Classified
805-60-55-7 If New Venture determines that the replacement share-based payment awards are classified as liabilities, then total liabilities will equal $50 million ($40 million + $10 million). For simplicity, when taking the share-based payment liabilities into account, the fair value of New Venture as a whole is $90 million ($100 million – $10 million).
805-60-55-8 New Venture calculates goodwill as follows (in millions), consistent with the guidance in paragraph 805-60-30-2. The formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole is equal to the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture’s equity (net assets) immediately following formation (including any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture).
Fair value of New Venture as a whole (including $5 noncontrolling interest)
$    90
Less: Net fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities recognized ($120 assets − $50 liabilities)
(70)
Goodwill recognized by New Venture at formation date
$    20
805-60-55-9 New Venture calculates additional paid-in capital as follows (in millions).
Net assets recognized by New Venture, excluding share-based payment liabilities ($120 identifiable assets – $40 liabilities + $20 goodwill)
$       100
Less: The fair value of noncontrolling interest in business contributed to New Venture
(5)
Less: The fair value of preformation vesting replacement share-based payments classified as a liability
(10)
Additional paid-in capital recognized by New Venture at the formation date
$      85
805-60-55-10 New Venture records the following entry at the formation date (in millions).
Identifiable assets recognized
$   120
Goodwill
20
Liabilities recognized
$ 40
Noncontrolling interest
5
Share-based payment liability (preformation vesting)
10
Additional paid-in capital
85
• • > Case B: Joint Venture Replacement Share-Based Payment Employee Awards Are Equity Classified
805-60-55-11 If New Venture determines that the replacement share-based payment awards are classified as equity, then total liabilities will equal $40 million and the fair value of New Venture as a whole is $100 million.
805-60-55-12 New Venture calculates goodwill as follows (in millions), consistent with the guidance in paragraph 805-60-30-2. The formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole is equal to the fair value of 100 percent of the joint venture’s equity (net assets) immediately following formation (including any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture).
Fair value of New Venture as a whole (including $5 noncontrolling interest)
$  100
Less: Net fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities recognized ($120 assets − $40 liabilities)
(80)
Goodwill recognized by New Venture at formation date
$   20
805-60-55-13 New Venture calculates additional paid-in capital, excluding additional paid-in capital attributable to share-based payments, as follows (in millions).
Net assets recognized by New Venture, excluding share-based payment liabilities ($120 identifiable assets – $40 liabilities + $20 goodwill)
$  100
Less: The fair value of noncontrolling interest in business contributed to New Venture
(5)
Less: The fair value of preformation vesting replacement share-based payments classified as equity
(10)
Additional paid-in capital recognized by New Venture at the formation date (excluding additional paid-in capital attributable to preformation vesting share-based payments)
$  85
805-60-55-14 New Venture records the following entry at the formation date (in millions).
Identifiable assets recognized
$  120
Goodwill
20
Liabilities recognized
$ 40
Noncontrolling interest
5
Additional paid-in capital—share-based payments (preformation vesting)
10
Additional paid-in capital
85
Transition and Open Effective Date Information
General
> Transition Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-05, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement
805-60-65-1 The following represents the transition and effective date information related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-05, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement:
Effective date and early adoption
a. All joint ventures with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025, shall apply the pending content that links to this paragraph. A joint venture with a formation date that occurs before the effective date need not apply the pending content that links to this paragraph to its formation transaction but has the option to apply the transition method described in (d) through (f).
b. Early adoption of the pending content that links to this paragraph is permitted in any interim or annual period in which financial statements have not yet been issued (or made available for issuance). A joint venture that elects to early adopt may apply the pending content that links to this paragraph either prospectively or retrospectively.
Transition method and initial application date
c. A joint venture with a formation date that occurs on or after the initial application date described in (e) shall apply the pending content that links to this paragraph prospectively to its formation transaction.
d. A joint venture with a formation date that occurs before the initial application date shall have the option to apply the pending content that links to this paragraph retrospectively, as if the joint venture had applied the pending content that links to this paragraph to its formation transaction, if the joint venture has sufficient information. A joint venture that elects to apply the pending content that links to this paragraph retrospectively shall:
1. Recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the pending content that links to this paragraph as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other appropriate components of equity in the statement of financial position) at the initial application date.
2. Apply any relevant guidance other than in this Subtopic (for example, for measuring identifiable assets, liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in accordance with Subtopic 805-20) as it existed at the formation date. See (f) for guidance on the initial application date when applying the pending content that links to this paragraph retrospectively.

e. The initial application date is the date that an entity first applies the pending content that links to this paragraph.
f. If applying the pending content that links to this paragraph retrospectively in accordance with (d), the initial application date shall be the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented.
Transition disclosures
g. An entity applying the pending content that links to this paragraph retrospectively in accordance with (d) shall provide the transition disclosures required by paragraphs 250-10-50-1 through 50-3 in the period that includes the initial application date.

Amendments to Subtopic 205-10

6. Amend paragraph 205-10-05-3, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Presentation of Financial Statements—Overall Overview and Background
205-10-05-3 The Discontinued Operations Subtopic discusses the conditions under which either of the following would be reported in an entity’s financial statements as a discontinued operation:
  1. A component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale
  2. A business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition or upon formation of a joint venture, is classified as held for sale.

Amendments to Subtopic 205-20

7. Amend paragraphs 205-20-15-2, 205-20-45-1D, and 205-20-55-82, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Presentation of Financial Statements—Discontinued Operations
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
205-20-15-2 The guidance in this Subtopic applies to either of the following:
  1. A component of an entity or a group of components of an entity that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale
  2. A business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition or upon formation of a joint venture, is classified as held for sale.

Other Presentation Matters
> What Is a Discontinued Operation?
• > A Discontinued Operation Comprising a Business or Nonprofit Activity
205-20-45-1D A business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition or upon formation of a joint venture, meets the criteria in paragraph 205-20-45-1E to be classified as held for sale is a discontinued operation. If the one-year requirement in paragraph 205-20-45-1E(d) is met (except as permitted by paragraph 205-20-45-1G), a business or nonprofit activity shall be classified as held for sale as a discontinued operation at the acquisition date or the formation date if the other criteria in paragraph 205-20-45-1E are probable of being met within a short period following the acquisition date or the formation date (usually within three months).
Implementation Guidance and Illustrations
> Implementation Guidance
205-20-55-82 The following flowchart provides an overview of the disclosures required for discontinued operations.
[Only the amended portion of this flowchart is shown here.]
Required Disclosures for a Discontinued Operation

Amendments to Subtopic 350-10

8. Amend paragraphs 350-10-05-1, 350-10-05-3 through 05-3A, and 350-10-15-3, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Overall
Overview and Background
350-10-05-1 The Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Topic provides guidance on financial accounting and reporting related to goodwill and other intangible assets, including the subsequent measurement of goodwill and intangible assets. It does not include guidance on the accounting at acquisition for goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination or in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity. It also does not include guidance on the accounting upon formation for goodwill and intangible assets recognized by a joint venture.
  1. Subparagraph superseded by Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04.
  2. Subparagraph superseded by Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04.
  3. Subparagraph superseded by Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04.

350-10-05-3 This Topic includes the following Subtopics:
  1. Overall.
  2. Goodwill—Subtopic 350-20 provides guidance on the measurement of goodwill after acquisition, derecognition of some or all of goodwill allocated to a reporting unit, other presentation matters, and disclosures.
  3. General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill—Subtopic 350-30 provides guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets other than goodwill that are either:
    1. Acquired individually or with a group of assets in a transaction that is not a business
      combination or
      combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation
    2. Internally generated.
  4. Internal-Use Software—Subtopic 350-40 provides guidance on the accounting for the cost of computer software that is developed or obtained for internal use and hosting arrangements obtained for internal use.
  5. Website Development Costs—Subtopic 350-50 provides guidance on whether to capitalize or expense costs incurred to develop a website.

350-10-05-3A Guidance for the financial accounting and reporting at acquisition of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit
entity
entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation is provided in the following Subtopics:
a. Subtopic 805-20 provides acquisition guidance for intangible assets acquired in a business combination or in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity.
b. Subtopic 805-30 provides guidance on recognition and initial measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination.
c. Subtopic 958-805 provides guidance on recognition and initial measurement of goodwill acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity.
d. Subtopic 805-60 provides guidance for a joint venture upon formation on recognition and initial measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
350-10-15-3 The guidance in the Intangibles—Goodwill and Other Topic does not apply to the following transactions and activities:
a. The accounting at acquisition for goodwill acquired in a business combination (for guidance see Subtopic 805-30)
b. Subparagraph not used.
c. The accounting at acquisition for goodwill acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity (for guidance see Subtopic 958-805)
d. The accounting at acquisition for intangible assets (other than goodwill) acquired in a business combination or in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity (for guidance see Subtopics 805-20 and
958-805).
958-805)
e. The accounting upon formation for intangible assets and goodwill recognized by a joint venture (for guidance see Subtopic 805-60).

Amendments to Subtopic 350-20

9. Amend paragraphs 350-20-05-2, 350-20-05-4A, 350-20-15-2, 350-20-15-4, 350-20-25-1, 350-20-35-41, 350-20-35-63, 350-20-50-4, and 350-20-50-7, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Goodwill
Overview and Background
350-20-05-2 Subtopic 805-30 provides guidance on recognition and initial measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. Subtopic 958-805 provides guidance on recognition and initial measurement of goodwill acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity. Subtopic 805-60 provides guidance on the recognition and initial measurement of goodwill by a joint venture upon formation.
350-20-05-4A Costs of developing, maintaining, or restoring internally generated goodwill should not be capitalized. For entities that do not elect the accounting alternative for amortizing goodwill included in the guidance in the Subsections outlined in paragraph 350-20-05-5A, goodwill that is recognized under the business combination guidance in Topic 805 and Subtopic 958-805 and goodwill that is recognized under the joint venture formation guidance in Subtopic 805-60 should not be amortized. Instead, it should be tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-28 through 35-32. If the accounting alternative for a goodwill impairment triggering event evaluation is elected, a goodwill impairment triggering event shall be evaluated in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-83 through 35-86.
Scope and Scope Exceptions
General
> Transactions
350-20-15-2 The guidance in this Subtopic applies to the following transactions and activities:
  1. Goodwill that an entity recognizes in accordance with Subtopic
    805- 30
    805-30, Subtopic 805-60, or Subtopic 958-805 after it has been initially recognized and measured
  2. The costs of internally developing goodwill and other unidentifiable intangible assets with indeterminate lives
  3. Subparagraph not used.
  4. Amounts recognized as goodwill in applying the equity method of accounting and to the excess reorganization value recognized by entities that adopt fresh-start reporting in accordance with Topic 852.
  5. Subparagraph not used.

Accounting Alternatives
350-20-15-4 A private company or not-for-profit entity may make an accounting policy election to apply the accounting alternative for amortizing goodwill in this
Subtopic to the following transactions or activities:
Subtopic. The guidance in the Accounting Alternatives Subsections of this Subtopic applies to the following transactions or activities:
  1. Goodwill that an entity recognizes in a business combination in accordance with Subtopic
    805-30 or
    805-30, in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity in accordance with Subtopic 958-805, or in a joint venture formation in accordance with Subtopic 805-60 after it has been initially recognized and measured
  2. Amounts recognized as goodwill in applying the equity method of accounting in accordance with Topic 323 on investments—equity method and joint ventures, and to the excess reorganization value recognized by entities that adopt fresh-start reporting in accordance with Topic 852 on reorganizations.

Recognition
350-20-25-1 See Subtopic 805-30 for guidance on recognition at acquisition of goodwill acquired in a business combination. See Subtopic 958-805 for guidance on recognition at acquisition of goodwill acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity. See Subtopic 805-60 for guidance on recognition of goodwill by a joint venture upon formation.
Subsequent Measurement
General
> Assigning Goodwill to Reporting Units
350-20-35-41 For the purpose of testing goodwill for impairment, all goodwill acquired in a business combination or recognized by a joint venture upon formation shall be assigned to one or more reporting units as of the acquisition date or the joint venture formation date. Goodwill shall be assigned to reporting units of the acquiring entity that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination even though other assets or liabilities of the acquired entity may not be assigned to that reporting unit. The total amount of acquired goodwill may be divided among a number of reporting units. The methodology used to determine the amount of goodwill to assign to a reporting unit shall be reasonable and supportable and shall be applied in a consistent manner. In addition, that methodology shall be consistent with the objectives of the process of assigning goodwill to reporting units described in paragraphs 350-20-35-42 through 35-43.
Accounting Alternatives
> Accounting Alternative for Amortizing Goodwill
• > Amortization of Goodwill
350-20-35-63 Goodwill relating to each business combination, acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, joint venture formation, or reorganization event resulting in fresh-start reporting (amortizable unit of goodwill) shall be amortized on a straight-line basis over 10 years, or less than 10 years if the entity demonstrates that another useful life is more appropriate.
Disclosure
Accounting Alternatives
> Disclosures about Additions to Goodwill
350-20-50-4 The following information shall be disclosed in the notes to financial statements for any additions to goodwill in each period for which a statement of financial position is presented:
  1. The amount assigned to goodwill in total and by major business combination, by major acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, by joint venture formation, or by reorganization event resulting in fresh-start reporting
  2. The weighted-average amortization period in total and the amortization period by major business combination, by major acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, by joint venture formation, or by reorganization event resulting in fresh-start reporting.

> Goodwill Impairment Loss
350-20-50-7 The quantitative disclosures about significant unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy required by paragraph 820-10-50-2(bbb) are not required for fair value measurements related to the financial accounting and reporting for goodwill after its initial recognition in a business
combination or
combination, an acquisition by not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation.

Amendments to Subtopic 350-30

10. Amend paragraphs 350-30-05-1 through 05-2, 350-30-15-3, 350-30-25-2, 350-30-25-4 through 25-5, 350-30-35-7, 350-30-35-17A, and 350-30-50-1, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill
Overview and Background
350-30-05-1 This Subtopic addresses financial accounting and reporting for intangible assets (other than goodwill) acquired individually or with a group of other assets and for the cost of developing, maintaining, or restoring internally generated intangible assets. However, it does not discuss the recognition and initial measurement of intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation. This Subtopic also addresses financial accounting and reporting for intangible assets after their acquisition, including intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or by a joint venture upon formation.
350-30-05-2 Guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired in a business combination or in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity is provided in Subtopics 805-20 and 958-805, respectively. Guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets by a joint venture upon formation is provided in Subtopic 805-60.
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
350-30-15-3 The guidance in this Subtopic applies to the following:
  1. Intangible assets acquired individually or with a group of other assets (but not the recognition and initial measurement of those acquired in a business
    combination or
    combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation)
  2. Intangible assets (other than goodwill) that an entity recognizes in accordance with Subtopic
    805-20
    805-20, 805-60, or 958-805 after they have been initially recognized and measured, except for those identified in
    the following
    paragraph 350-30-15-4
  3. Subparagraph not used.
  4. Costs of internally developing identifiable intangible assets that an entity recognizes as assets.

The disclosure requirements of paragraphs 350-30-50-1 through 50-3 also apply to capitalized software costs.
Recognition
350-30-25-2 As indicated in paragraph 805-50-30-3, the cost of a group of assets acquired in a transaction other than a business
combination or
combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation shall be allocated to the individual assets acquired based on their relative fair values and shall not give rise to goodwill.
350-30-25-4 Intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of assets in a transaction other than a business
combination or
combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture upon formation may meet asset recognition criteria in FASB Concepts Statement No. 5, Recognition and Measurement in Financial Statements of Business Enterprises, even though they do not meet either the contractual-legal criterion or the separability criterion (for example, specially-trained employees or a unique manufacturing process related to an acquired manufacturing plant). Such transactions commonly are bargained exchange transactions that are conducted at arm’s length, which provides reliable evidence about the existence and fair value of those assets. Thus, those assets shall be recognized as intangible assets.
> Defensive Intangible Assets
350-30-25-5 A defensive intangible asset, other than an intangible asset that is used in research and development activities, shall be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. Such a defensive intangible asset shall not be included as part of the cost of an entity’s existing intangible asset(s). For implementation guidance on determining whether an intangible asset is a defensive intangible asset, see paragraph 350-30-55-1. For guidance on intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are used in research and development activities (regardless of whether they have an alternative future use), see paragraph 350-30-35-17A. For guidance on intangibles that are purchased from others for a particular research and development project and that have no alternative future uses (in other research and development projects or otherwise), see Subtopic 730-10.
Subsequent Measurement
> Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization
350-30-35-7 An intangible asset shall not be written down or off in the period of acquisition unless it becomes impaired during that period. However, paragraph 730-10-25-2(c) requires amounts assigned to intangible assets acquired in a transaction other than a business combination or an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are to be used in a particular research and development project and that have no alternative future use to be charged to expense at the acquisition date.
> Recognition and Measurement of an Impairment Loss
• > Intangible Assets Not Subject to Amortization
350-30-35-17A Intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are used in research and development activities (regardless of whether they have an alternative future use) shall be considered indefinite lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. During the period that those assets are considered indefinite lived, they shall not be amortized but shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-30-35-18 through 35-19. Once the research and development efforts are completed or abandoned, the entity shall determine the useful life of the assets based on the guidance in this Section. Consistent with the guidance in paragraph 360-10-35-49, intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that have been temporarily idled shall not be accounted for as if abandoned.
Disclosure
> Disclosures in the Period of Acquisition
350-30-50-1 For intangible assets acquired either individually or as part of a group of assets (in
either
an asset acquisition, a business combination,
or
an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation), all of the following information shall be disclosed in the notes to financial statements in the period of acquisition:
  1. For intangible assets subject to amortization, all of the following:
    1. The total amount assigned and the amount assigned to any major intangible asset class
    2. The amount of any significant residual value, in total and by major intangible asset class
    3. The weighted-average amortization period, in total and by major intangible asset class.
  2. For intangible assets not subject to amortization, the total amount assigned and the amount assigned to any major intangible asset class.
  3. The amount of research and development assets acquired in a transaction other than a business
    combination or
    combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation and written off in the period and the line item in the income statement in which the amounts written off are aggregated.
  4. For intangible assets with renewal or extension terms, the weighted-average period before the next renewal or extension (both explicit and implicit), by major intangible asset class.

This information also shall be disclosed separately for each material business combination or acquisition by a not-for-profit entity or in the aggregate for individually immaterial business combinations or acquisitions by a not-for-profit entity that are material collectively if the aggregate fair values of intangible assets acquired, other than goodwill, are significant.

Amendments to Subtopic 450-10

11. Amend paragraph 450-10-15-2A, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Contingencies—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
450-10-15-2A The guidance in the Contingencies Topic does not apply to the recognition and initial measurement of assets or liabilities arising from contingencies that are measured at fair value or assets arising from contingencies measured at an amount other than fair value on the acquisition date in a business combination
or
under the requirements of Subtopic 805-20, on the acquisition date in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity under the requirements of Subtopic
805-20 or 958-805
958-805, or on the formation date in a joint venture formation under the requirements of Subtopic 805-60. Those Subtopics provide the recognition and initial measurement requirements for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies measured at fair value and for assets arising from contingencies measured at an amount other than fair value as part of a business
combination or
combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation.

Amendments to Subtopic 718-10

12. Add paragraph 718-10-15-8, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Compensation—Stock Compensation—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
718-10-15-8 Paragraph 805-60-25-8 provides guidance on determining whether share-based payment awards issued by a joint venture upon formation are part of the joint venture formation transaction and, therefore, are within the scope of Subtopic 805-60, or are for continued service to be recognized in the postformation period in accordance with this Topic.

Amendments to Subtopic 730-10

13. Amend paragraphs 730-10-15-4(f) and 730-10-25-1, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Research and Development—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
730-10-15-4 The guidance in this Topic does not apply to the following transactions and activities:
f.  Research and development assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation. If tangible and intangible assets acquired in that manner are used in research and development activities, they are recognized and measured at fair value in accordance with Subtopic 805-20, regardless of whether they have an alternative future use. After recognition, tangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are used in research and development activities are accounted for in accordance with their nature. After recognition, intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are used in research and development activities are accounted for in accordance with Topic 350.
Recognition
> Accounting for Research and Development Costs
730-10-25-1 Research and development costs encompassed by this Subtopic shall be charged to expense when incurred. As noted in paragraph 730-10-15-4(f), this Topic does not apply to tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business
combination or
combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation that are used in research and development activities.

Amendments to Subtopic 740-10

14. Amend paragraphs 740-10-05-8 and 740-10-30-4, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Income Taxes—Overall
Overview and Background
740-10-05-8 As indicated in paragraph 740-10-25-23, temporary differences that will result in taxable amounts in future years when the related asset or liability is recovered or settled are often referred to as taxable temporary differences. Likewise, temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years are often referred to as deductible temporary differences. Business combinations and joint venture formations may give rise to both taxable and deductible temporary differences.
Initial Measurement
> Basic Requirements
• > Deferred Tax Expense (or Benefit)
740-10-30-4 Deferred tax expense (or benefit) is the change during the year in an entity’s deferred tax liabilities and assets. For deferred tax liabilities and assets recognized in a business combination or in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity during the year, it is the change since the acquisition date. For deferred tax liabilities and assets recognized by a corporate joint venture upon formation, during the year that includes the formation date, it is the change since the formation date. Paragraph 830-740-45-1 addresses the manner of reporting the transaction gain or loss that is included in the net change in a deferred foreign tax liability or asset when the reporting currency is the functional currency.

Amendments to Subtopic 805-10

15. Amend paragraphs 805-10-05-1, 805-10-15-1, and 805-10-15-4(a), with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Business Combinations—Overall
Overview and Background
805-10-05-1 The Business Combinations Topic provides guidance on the accounting and reporting for transactions that represent business combinations to be accounted for under the acquisition method (as described in paragraph 805-10-05-4). In addition, the Topic includes Subtopic 805-50, which provides guidance on transactions sometimes associated with business combinations but that do not meet the requirements to be accounted for as business combinations under the acquisition method, and Subtopic 805-60, which provides guidance on the formation of a joint venture. The Business Combinations Topic includes the following Subtopics:
a. Overall
b. Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest
c. Goodwill or Gain from Bargain Purchase, Including Consideration Transferred
d. Reverse Acquisitions
e. Related Issues
f. Income
Taxes
.Taxes
g. Joint Venture Formations.
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Overall Guidance
805-10-15-1 The Scope Section of the Overall Subtopic establishes the pervasive scope for all Subtopics of the Business Combinations Topic. Unless explicitly addressed within specific Subtopics, the following scope guidance applies to all Subtopics of the Business Combinations Topic, with the exception of Subtopic 805-50 and Subtopic 805-60, each of which has its own discrete scope guidance.
> Transactions
805-10-15-4 The guidance in the Business Combinations Topic does not apply to any of the following:
  1. The formation of a {add glossary link}joint venture{add glossary link} or a corporate joint venture (except as described in Subtopic 805-60)

Amendments to Subtopic 805-20

16. Amend paragraph 805-20-15-2, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Business Combinations—Identifiable Assets and Liabilities, and Any Noncontrolling Interest
Scope and Scope Exceptions
Accounting Alternatives
805-20-15-2 A private company or not-for-profit entity may make an accounting policy election to apply the accounting alternative in this Subtopic. The guidance in the Accounting Alternative Subsections of this Subtopic applies when a private company or not-for-profit entity is required to recognize or otherwise consider the fair value of intangible assets as a result of any one of the following transactions:
a. Applying the acquisition method (as described in paragraph 805-10-05-4 for all entities and Subtopic 958-805 for additional guidance for not-for-profit entities)
b. Assessing the nature of the difference between the carrying amount of an investment and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of an investee when applying the equity method of accounting in accordance with Topic 323 on investments—equity method and joint ventures
c. Adopting fresh-start reporting in accordance with Topic 852 on
reorganizations.
reorganizations
d. Accounting for the formation of a joint venture in accordance with Subtopic 805-60.

Amendments to Subtopic 805-50

17. Add paragraph 805-50-15-4A, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Business Combinations—Related Issues
Scope and Scope Exceptions
Acquisition of Assets Rather than a Business
> Transactions
805-50-15-4A The guidance in the Acquisition of Assets Rather than a Business Subsections does not apply to the initial measurement and recognition of assets and liabilities by a joint venture upon formation. Guidance for joint venture formations is provided in Subtopic 805-60.

Amendments to Subtopic 808-10

18. Amend paragraph 808-10-15-4, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Collaborative Arrangements—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Other Considerations
808-10-15-4 A collaborative arrangement within the scope of this Topic is not primarily conducted through a separate legal entity created for that activity. However, in some situations part of a collaborative arrangement may be conducted in a legal entity for specific activities or for a specific geographic location. The existence of a legal entity for part of an arrangement does not prevent an arrangement from being a collaborative arrangement. The part of the arrangement that is conducted in a separate legal entity shall be accounted for under the guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation, Subtopic 805-60, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations, Subtopic 323-10, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures, or other related accounting literature. However, the disclosures required by paragraph 808-10-50-1 apply to the entire collaborative arrangement, notwithstanding that a portion of the collaborative arrangement may be conducted in a legal entity.

Amendments to Subtopic 810-10

19. Add paragraph 810-10-30-5, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Consolidation—Overall
Initial Measurement
Variable Interest Entities
> Valuation of Assets, Liabilities, and Noncontrolling Interests in a Newly Consolidated VIE
• > All Primary Beneficiaries
810-10-30-3 When a reporting entity becomes the primary beneficiary of a VIE that is not a business, no goodwill shall be recognized. The primary beneficiary initially shall measure and recognize the assets (except for goodwill) and liabilities of the VIE in accordance with Sections 805-20-25 and 805-20-30. However, the primary beneficiary initially shall measure assets and liabilities that it has transferred to that VIE at, after, or shortly before the date that the reporting entity became the primary beneficiary at the same amounts at which the assets and liabilities would have been measured if they had not been transferred. No gain or loss shall be recognized because of such transfers.
810-10-30-4 The primary beneficiary of a VIE that is not a business shall recognize a gain or loss for the difference between (a) and (b):
  1. The sum of:
    1. The fair value of any consideration paid
    2. The fair value of any noncontrolling interests
    3. The reported amount of any previously held interests
  2. The net amount of the VIE’s identifiable assets and liabilities recognized and measured in accordance with Topic 805.
    1. Subparagraph not used.
    2. Subparagraph not used.
    3. Subparagraph not used.

810-10-30-5
Paragraph not used.
Paragraphs 810-10-30-3 through 30-4 shall not apply to a joint venture reporting entity that becomes the primary beneficiary of a VIE that is not a business upon a joint venture formation accounted for in accordance with Subtopic 805-60.

Amendments to Subtopic 815-10

20. Amend paragraph 815-10-15-74, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Derivatives and Hedging—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Instruments
• > Instruments Not within Scope
• • > Certain Contracts Involving an Entity’s Own Equity
815-10-15-74 Notwithstanding the conditions of paragraphs 815-10-15-13 through 15-139, the reporting entity shall not consider the following contracts to be derivative instruments for purposes of this Subtopic:
a. Contracts issued or held by that reporting entity that are both:
1. Indexed to its own stock (see Section 815-40-15)
2. Classified in stockholders’ equity in its statement of financial position (see Section 815-40-25).
b. Contracts issued by the entity that are subject to Topic 718. If any such contract ceases to be subject to Topic 718 in accordance with paragraphs 718-10-35-9 through 35-14, the terms of that contract shall then be analyzed to determine whether the contract is subject to this Subtopic. An award that ceases to be subject to Topic 718 in accordance with those paragraphs shall be analyzed to determine whether it is subject to this Subtopic.
c. Any of the following contracts:
1. A contract between an acquirer and a seller to enter into a business combination
2. A contract to enter into an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity
3. A contract between one or more NFPs to enter into a
merger of not-for-profit entities.
merger of not-for-profit entities
4. In a joint venture’s separate financial statements, a contract between a joint venture and its venturers related to the formation of the joint venture accounted for in accordance with Subtopic 805-60.
d. Forward contracts that require settlement by the reporting entity’s delivery of cash in exchange for the acquisition of a fixed number of its equity shares (forward purchase contracts for the reporting entity’s shares that require physical settlement) that are accounted for under paragraphs 480-10-30-3 through 30-5, 480-10-35-3, and 480-10-45-3.

Amendments to Subtopic 842-10

21. Amend paragraph 842-10-55-11, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Leases—Overall
Implementation Guidance and Illustrations
> Implementation Guidance
• > Lease Classification
• • > Lease of an Acquiree
842-10-55-11 In a business combination or an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, the acquiring entity should retain the previous lease classification in accordance with this Subtopic unless there is a lease modification and that modification is not accounted for as a separate contract in accordance with paragraph 842-10-25-8. A joint venture formation accounted for in accordance with Subtopic 805-60 should apply the guidance in this paragraph applicable to the acquiring entity in a business combination. The joint venture should be viewed as analogous to the acquiring entity in a business combination, and any recognized businesses and/or assets should be viewed as analogous to an acquiree.

Amendments to Subtopic 842-20

22. Amend paragraph 842-20-35-13, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Leases—Lessee
Subsequent Measurement
> Amortization of Leasehold Improvements
842-20-35-13 Leasehold improvements acquired in a
business combination or
business combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation shall be amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets and the remaining lease term at the date of acquisition.

Amendments to Subtopic 842-50

23. Amend paragraphs 842-50-15-1 and 842-50-45-3, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60-65-1, as follows:
Leases—Leveraged Lease Arrangements
Scope and Scope Exceptions
842-50-15-1 This Subtopic addresses accounting for leases that meet the criteria in transition paragraph 842-10-65-1(z). If a lessee exercises an option to extend a lease that meets the criteria in transition paragraph 842-10-65-1(z) that it was not previously reasonably assured of exercising, the exercise of that option shall be considered a lease modification as described in paragraph 842-10-65-1(z). A joint venture formation accounted for in accordance with Subtopic 805-60 shall apply the guidance in this Subtopic applicable to the acquiring entity in a business combination. The joint venture shall be viewed as analogous to the acquiring entity in a business combination, and any recognized businesses and/or assets shall be viewed as analogous to an acquiree.
Other Presentation Matters
> Income Taxes and Leveraged Leases
842-50-45-3 This Subtopic requires that the tax effect of any difference between the assigned value and the tax basis of a leveraged lease at the date of a business
combination or
combination, an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or a joint venture formation shall not be accounted for as a deferred tax credit. Any tax effects included in unearned and deferred income as required by this Subtopic shall not be offset by the deferred tax consequences of other temporary differences or by the tax benefit of operating loss or tax credit carryforwards. However, deferred tax credits that arise after the date of a combination shall be accounted for in the same manner as for leveraged leases that were not acquired in a combination.

Amendments to Subtopic 845-10

24. Amend paragraph 845-10-15-4(b), with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Nonmonetary Transactions—Overall
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
845-10-15-4 The guidance in the Nonmonetary Transactions Topic does not apply to the following transactions:
b. A transfer of nonmonetary assets solely between entities or persons under common control, such as between a parent and its subsidiaries or between two subsidiaries of the same parent, or between a joint venture or a corporate joint venture
corporate joint venture
and its owners (see Subtopic 805-60 for accounting for transfers of nonmonetary assets upon formation of a joint venture)

Amendments to Subtopic 985-20

25. Amend paragraph 985-20-15-3, with a link to transition paragraph 805-60- 65-1, as follows:
Software—Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed
Scope and Scope Exceptions
> Transactions
985-20-15-3 The guidance in this Subtopic does not apply to the following transactions and activities:
  1. Software developed or obtained for internal use (see Subtopic 350-40).
  2. Research and development assets acquired in a business
    combination or
    combination, acquired in an acquisition by a not-for-profit entity, or recognized by a joint venture upon formation. If tangible and intangible assets acquired in those combinations are used in research and development activities, they are recognized and measured at fair value in accordance with Subtopic 805-20.
  3. Arrangements to deliver software or a software system, either alone or together with other products or services, requiring significant production, modification, or customization of software (see the guidance on costs to fulfill a contract in Subtopic 340-40).

Amendments to Status Sections

26. Amend paragraph 205-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
205-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
205-10-05-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
27. Amend paragraph 205-20-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
205-20-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
205-20-15-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
205-20-45-1D
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
205-20-55-82
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
28. Amend paragraph 350-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
350-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-10-05-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-10-05-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-10-05-3A
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-10-15-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
29. Amend paragraph 350-20-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
350-20-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Formation Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-05-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-05-4A
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-15-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-15-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-25-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-35-41
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-35-63
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-50-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-20-50-7
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
30. Amend paragraph 350-30-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
350-30-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Formation Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-05-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-05-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-15-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-25-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-25-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-25-5
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-35-7
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-35-17A
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
350-30-50-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
31. Amend paragraph 450-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
450-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Formation Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
450-10-15-2A
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
32. Amend paragraph 718-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
718-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
718-10-15-8
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
33. Amend paragraph 730-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
730-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
730-10-15-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
730-10-25-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
34. Amend paragraph 740-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
740-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Formation Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
740-10-05-8
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
740-10-30-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
35. Amend paragraph 805-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
805-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-10-05-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-10-15-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-10-15-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
36. Amend paragraph 805-20-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
805-20-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-20-15-2
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
37. Amend paragraph 805-30-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
805-30-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
38. Amend paragraph 805-40-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
805-40-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
39. Amend paragraph 805-50-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
805-50-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-50-15-4A
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
40. Add paragraph 805-60-00-1 as follows:
805-60-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Acquiree
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Acquirer
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Acquisition by a Not-for-Profit Entity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Acquisition Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Business
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Business Combination
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Control (3rd def.)
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Equity Interests
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Fair Value (2nd def.)
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Financial Asset
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Formation Date
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Goodwill
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Identifiable
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Intangible Assets
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Legal Entity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Market Participants
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Noncontrolling Interest
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Nonprofit Activity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Not-for-Profit Entity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Orderly Transaction
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Owners
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Private Company
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Public Business Entity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Related Parties
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Security (2nd def.)
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Variable Interest Entity
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-05-1
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-05-2
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-15-1 through 15-4
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-25-1 through 25-15
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-30-1 through 30-7
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-35-1
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-35-2
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-45-1
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-50-1 through 50-3
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-55-1 through 55-14
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
805-60-65-1
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
41. Amend paragraph 805-740-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
805-740-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
42. Amend paragraph 808-10-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
808-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
808-10-15-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
43. Amend paragraph 810-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
810-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
810-10-30-5
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
44. Amend paragraph 815-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
815-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
815-10-15-74
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
45. Amend paragraph 842-10-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
842-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
842-10-55-11
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
46. Amend paragraph 842-20-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
842-20-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
842-20-35-13
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
47. Amend paragraph 842-50-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
842-50-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
842-50-15-1
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
842-50-45-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
48. Amend paragraph 845-10-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
845-10-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
845-10-15-4
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
49. Amend paragraph 958-805-00-1, by adding the following item to the table, as follows:
958-805-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Goodwill
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
50. Amend paragraph 985-20-00-1, by adding the following items to the table, as follows:
985-20-00-1 The following table identifies the changes made to this Subtopic.
Paragraph
Action
Accounting
Standards
Update
Date
Corporate Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
Joint Venture
Added
2023-05
08/23/2023
985-20-15-3
Amended
2023-05
08/23/2023
The amendments in this Update were adopted by the unanimous vote of the seven members of the Financial Accounting Standards Board:
Richard R. Jones, Chair
James L. Kroeker, Vice Chairman
Christine A. Botosan
Gary R. Buesser
Frederick L. Cannon
Susan M. Cosper
Marsha L. Hunt

Background Information and Basis for Conclusions

Introduction

BC1. The following summarizes the Board’s considerations in reaching the conclusions in this Update. It includes reasons for accepting certain approaches and rejecting others. Individual Board members gave greater weight to some factors than to others.
BC2. The objectives of the amendments in this Update are to (a) provide decision-useful information to a joint venture’s investors and (b) reduce diversity in practice in the accounting for contributions made to a joint venture upon formation in a joint venture’s separate financial statements. The amendments add Subtopic 805-60, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations, to address the accounting by a joint venture for its net assets (including assets and businesses contributed and liabilities assumed) upon formation.
BC3. The amendments in this Update affect entities that meet the definition of a joint venture (or a corporate joint venture) in the Master Glossary at the formation date of those entities. The amendments do not amend guidance on the definition of a joint venture or a corporate joint venture, the accounting by an equity method investor for its investment in a joint venture, or the accounting by a joint venture for contributions received after its formation.

Background Information

BC4. A joint venture is defined in the Master Glossary as follows:
    An entity owned and operated by a small group of businesses (the joint venturers) as a separate and specific business or project for the mutual benefit of the members of the group. A government may also be a member of the group. The purpose of a joint venture frequently is to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product, or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities. A joint venture also usually provides an arrangement under which each joint venturer may participate, directly or indirectly, in the overall management of the joint venture. Joint venturers thus have an interest or relationship other than as passive investors. An entity that is a subsidiary of one of the joint venturers is not a joint venture. The ownership of a joint venture seldom changes, and its equity interests usually are not traded publicly. A minority public ownership, however, does not preclude an entity from being a joint venture. As distinguished from a corporate joint venture, a joint venture is not limited to corporate entities.
BC5. A corporate joint venture is a type of joint venture and, accordingly, is similarly defined in the Master Glossary, but is specifically a corporation. Therefore, the scope of this project includes both joint ventures and corporate joint ventures, which are referred to collectively as joint ventures.
BC6. While joint ventures are defined in the Master Glossary, the formation accounting by a joint venture in its separate financial statements, specifically the joint venture’s recognition and initial measurement of net assets, including businesses contributed to it, is not addressed in the Codification. Furthermore, transactions between a corporate joint venture and its owners (the venturers), including upon formation, are specifically excluded from the scope of Topic 845, Nonmonetary Transactions, and the formation of a joint venture is specifically excluded from the scope of Topic 805, Business Combinations.
BC7. In the absence of specific authoritative guidance, practice has relied on nonauthoritative sources, which has resulted in diversity in practice in how contributions to a joint venture upon formation are accounted for by a joint venture. Some joint ventures initially measure their net assets at fair value at the formation date, while other joint ventures initially measure their net assets at the venturers’ carrying amounts.
BC8. At its September 18, 2019 meeting, the Board added a narrow-scope project to its agenda to address the recognition and initial measurement by a joint venture for contributions of nonmonetary assets by the venturers upon formation of the joint venture. On July 22, 2020, the Board clarified that the scope of that project should include all contributions made to a joint venture upon formation, regardless of whether they are monetary or nonmonetary.
BC9. The Board issued proposed Accounting Standards Update, Business Combinations—Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement, for public comment on October 27, 2022, and received 23 comment letters in response to the amendments in that proposed Update. Overall, a majority of comment letter respondents supported the Board’s efforts in this project and the project’s objectives. While a majority of respondents expressed broad support, many respondents provided suggestions, including clarifications and other potential improvements to the proposed amendments. The Board considered stakeholder feedback received throughout the course of this project and respondents’ comments in reaching the conclusions in this Update, as discussed further below.

Authoritative Guidance

BC10. In 1971, APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, stated that venturers (the investors in a joint venture) should account for investments in common stock of corporate joint ventures using the equity method in consolidated financial statements. Opinion 18 defined corporate joint venture, which remains in the current Master Glossary. Opinion 18 did not provide guidance on how a joint venture should account for its own formation. However, Opinion 18 did provide that, in using the equity method of accounting, equity method investors, including venturers, should account for the difference between the cost of an equity method investment (including an investment in a joint venture) and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of the investee (referred to as basis difference) as if the investee were a consolidated subsidiary (currently in paragraph 323-10-35-13).
BC11. Opinion 18 did not provide guidance on a joint venture’s accounting in its separate financial statements, and the Board has not issued any guidance on the accounting for a joint venture to date. To the contrary, joint venture accounting has specifically been excluded from the scope of certain guidance, including:
  1. In 1973, the Accounting Principles Board (APB) concluded in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, that general accounting for nonmonetary transactions should be based on the fair values of the assets (or services) involved, which is the same basis used in monetary transactions. However, Opinion 29 explicitly excluded transfers of nonmonetary assets between a corporate joint venture and its owners from the scope of that guidance. Transfers of nonmonetary assets between a corporate joint venture and its owners continue to be excluded from the scope of the guidance in Topic 845 (paragraph 845-10-15-4(b)).
  2. In 2001, the Board explicitly excluded joint ventures from the scope of business combinations guidance in FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations. At that time, the Board stated that it intended to consider issues on the formation of joint ventures and other new entity formations in another project and would consider whether joint venture formations and multi-party business combinations should be accounted for under the fresh-start method rather than the purchase method. Under the fresh-start method, the assets and liabilities of the combining entities would be recognized at fair value in the combined entity’s financial statements.
  3. In 2007, the Board confirmed, with the guidance included in FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, that joint ventures are explicitly excluded from the scope of the business combinations guidance. In paragraph B59 of Statement 141(R), the Board continued to state that issues related to joint ventures are appropriately excluded from the business combinations guidance. In the basis for conclusions of Statement 141(R), the Board once again expressed interest in considering whether joint venture formations should be accounted for by the fresh-start method and that it might undertake a future project to consider that issue. The formation of a joint venture continues to be excluded from the scope of Topic 805 (paragraph 805-10-15-4(a)).

Historical Perspectives

BC12. On July 17, 1979, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) published an Issues Paper, Joint Venture Accounting, which made the following conclusions about accounting for joint ventures:
  1. The creation of a joint venture establishes a reporting entity separate from the owners that requires a new basis of accounting for its assets and liabilities.
  2. Assets contributed to the venture should be recorded at the amount agreed on by the parties, which is assumed to be determined by reference to fair market value, but not in excess of the assets’ fair market value.

BC13. In 1998, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) evaluated the accounting by joint ventures for businesses received at the joint venture’s formation. In EITF Issue No. 98-4, “Accounting by a Joint Venture for Businesses Received at Its Formation,” the EITF acknowledged that most of the existing accounting guidance on joint ventures focused on the accounting by the venturers and not on the accounting in the separate financial statements of the joint venture. The EITF said that, in general, practice had developed to record contributed businesses at the predecessor’s basis unless certain conditions were met, which were historically described by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff. Conditions described in Issue 98-4, Issue Summary No. 1, included the following:
  1. The fair value of the businesses contributed is objectively determinable and supported by an equal contribution of monetary assets by the other investors.
  2. The monetary assets stay in the joint venture or are used by the joint venture in transactions with parties other than the venturers.
  3. There is an equal allocation of the joint venture’s equity and profits and losses among the venturers.

The EITF did not reach a consensus on Issue 98-4.
BC14. At the 2009 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments, the SEC staff said that it may be appropriate for a joint venture to step up contributed noncash assets to fair value in more circumstances than those historically conveyed by the SEC staff.
BC15. The SEC staff acknowledged at the 2014 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments that significant diversity in practice exists in accounting for those transactions. The SEC staff also commented that it would be appropriate for the Board to (a) consider providing clarity on the definition of a joint venture in Topic 323, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures, and (b) provide guidance on a joint venture’s accounting for contributed assets and businesses.

Benefits and Costs

BC16. The objective of financial reporting is to provide information that is useful to present and potential investors, creditors, donors, and other capital market participants in making rational investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions. However, the benefits of providing information for that purpose should justify the related costs. Present and potential investors, creditors, donors, and other users of financial information benefit from improvements in financial reporting, while the costs to implement new guidance are borne primarily by present investors. The Board’s assessment of the costs and benefits of issuing new guidance is unavoidably more qualitative than quantitative because there is no method to objectively measure the costs to implement new guidance or to quantify the value of improved information in financial statements.
BC17. One of the objectives of the amendments in this Update is to improve and enhance the financial reporting requirements for newly formed joint ventures, which will, in turn, achieve the other objective to provide more decision-useful information to investors. These objectives are consistent with the objective of general purpose financial reporting.
BC18. Over the course of this project, the Board and staff conducted extensive outreach with investors, preparers, and practitioners to obtain information about joint venture formation accounting. Those outreach activities included more than 100 interactions with preparers, investors, practitioners, industry groups, a regulator, and others.
BC19. On the basis of extensive due process and significant stakeholder input, the Board concluded that the amendments in this Update provide investors with more decision-useful information than current GAAP. In particular, the amendments reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on the recognition and initial measurement by a joint venture for its net assets upon formation because there is currently no specific authoritative guidance for newly formed joint ventures. The Board expects that this guidance will provide clarity and increase consistency in accounting for joint venture formations and align more closely with the accounting required for the venturers and, thus, reduce or eliminate differences in the basis of the joint venture’s financial statements when compared with the reported investment by the venturers. Additionally, some Board members expect that requiring a new basis of accounting will improve the decision usefulness and relevancy of the information provided to a user of joint venture financial statements upon formation.
BC20. As with any new guidance, there will be costs to implement the amendments in this Update. The Board notes that incremental costs are expected to be incurred when compared with costs incurred in current practice because there is currently no specific authoritative guidance. When making its decisions, the Board considered costs together with the overall benefits as well as the benefits and costs of specific requirements. The magnitude of the following costs will vary depending on several factors, including whether a joint venture would have applied a fair value measurement approach absent the amendments:
  1. One-time costs to identify and measure the net assets contributed to a joint venture upon formation
  2. Ongoing costs to comply with the subsequent measurement requirements for certain assets, including intangible assets and goodwill, if any.

BC21. Therefore, the Board acknowledges that joint ventures may incur incremental costs as a result of the amendments in this Update. However, the Board anticipates that in some circumstances those costs will be mitigated for one or more of the following reasons.
  1. An additional valuation may not be necessary because venturers contributing businesses or nonfinancial assets to a joint venture upon formation are required to initially measure their interest in the joint venture at fair value.
  2. The joint venture’s accounting will more closely align with the accounting required for the venturers and, thus, reduce or eliminate differences in the basis of the joint venture’s financial statements when compared with the reported investment by the venturers.
  3. Uncertainty about which measurement approach is permissible for a newly formed joint venture in its financial statements will be eliminated because of the explicit authoritative guidance that addresses how a joint venture should account for its formation.

BC22. The Board therefore concluded that the expected benefits of the amendments justify the expected costs.

Basis for Conclusions

New Basis of Accounting

BC23. To reduce diversity in practice and provide decision-useful information to a joint venture’s investors, the amendments in this Update require that a joint venture apply a new basis of accounting. As a result, a newly formed joint venture will initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value upon formation (with exceptions to fair value measurement that are consistent with the business combinations guidance). That approach is generally consistent with other new basis of accounting models in GAAP, such as fresh-start reporting in accordance with Topic 852, Reorganizations. It is also broadly consistent with the accounting outcome that would result from treating the joint venture as the accounting acquirer of a business within the scope of Subtopic 805-10, Business Combinations—Overall.
BC24. Nearly all comment letter respondents supported requiring a new basis of accounting upon formation. Most stakeholders throughout the course of this project and comment letter respondents supported fair value measurement at joint venture formation for one or more of the following reasons:
  1. Formation of a joint venture represents the creation of a new entity and should require a new basis of accounting. Stakeholders explained that they view a joint venture formation as a change in control of the contributed net assets that should result in a new basis for recognition and initial measurement. Said differently, those stakeholders view the formation of a joint venture as a new reporting entity that is separate from the venturers that previously controlled the assets or businesses that were contributed upon formation.
  2. Valuations are often performed as part of the venturers’ negotiation process. Preparers explained that estimating the value of the net assets contributed to a joint venture is inherent in the process undertaken by unrelated parties to negotiate the terms of a joint venture formation. To exercise appropriate stewardship over the assets it controls, management of a venturer often will conduct due diligence using either internal or external valuation estimates to ensure that the transaction is sufficiently equitable in terms of the rights exchanged by the investors in the joint venture.
  3. A new basis of accounting will reduce equity method basis differences for the venturer. Stakeholders noted that GAAP requires that a venturer record the derecognition or deconsolidation of contributed nonfinancial assets and businesses at fair value on the basis of the guidance in Subtopic 610-20, Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets, and Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall. If the joint venture were required to measure contributions of such assets upon formation at a value other than fair value in its financial statements, the venturers would have to account for equity method basis differences because of the measurement differences. Preparers noted that tracking equity method basis differences often is a manual process that creates additional costs and complexity and, although not the objective of the project, any reduction of basis differences for venturers would be a significant benefit.
  4. Entities may already be applying fair value to their joint venture formations. Many preparers said that they currently apply fair value to their joint venture formation transactions. Therefore, the amendments in this Update will not cause those preparers to incur significant incremental costs.

BC25. For those reasons, the Board decided to require that joint ventures apply a new basis of accounting to achieve the project objectives of providing useful financial information to the users of joint venture financial statements while reducing the current diversity in practice. The Board acknowledges that fair value measurements, which are inherent in applying a new basis of accounting, often are viewed as more costly to determine than historical-based measures, such as those at carrying amounts. However, in the Board’s view, in this situation, requiring the joint venture to apply a new basis of accounting will not necessarily introduce significant incremental costs. Additionally, Board members expressed concerns that requiring or allowing a measurement other than those based on fair values would create inconsistencies between the accounting for contributions made to the joint venture upon formation and the accounting for subsequent contributions, which generally would be recognized at fair value in accordance with other GAAP.
BC26. Furthermore, the Board decided that because venturers, in accordance with paragraph 323-10-30-2, are required to initially measure their equity method investments at fair value or cost depending on what assets or businesses are contributed, requiring a new basis of accounting for the joint venture upon formation will have the added benefit of reducing equity method basis differences for the venturers. Separately, the Board expects that joint ventures will be able to leverage the results from the venturers’ measurements to reduce the overall costs of applying fair value upon formation.
BC27. Although many preparers during outreach indicated that they currently apply fair value upon formation of a joint venture, several comment letter respondents acknowledged that some entities account for contributions at the venturers’ carrying amounts on the basis of nonauthoritative sources and a lack of specific authoritative guidance. Therefore, those respondents and the Board acknowledge that a requirement to apply a new basis of accounting could be a significant change from current practice for some entities. However, the Board notes that requiring a joint venture to apply a new basis of accounting upon formation is aligned with the negotiation process and the understanding of the parties involved regarding the value contributed.

Scope of Subtopic 805-60

Entities That May Be Proportionately Consolidated
BC28. The amendments in this Update provide a scope exception for joint ventures that may be proportionately consolidated by one or more of the venturers. In certain specialized industries (such as the extractive and construction industries), there may be circumstances in which one or more venturers initially account for their interest in a joint venture in accordance with Subtopic 610-20, while the other venturers initially account for their interest in the same joint venture through proportionate consolidation in accordance with Subtopic 810-10. The Board noted that the costs of applying a new basis of accounting are not necessarily the same for a joint venture that is proportionately consolidated by one or more of its venturers and further research would be needed to determine whether a pervasive financial reporting issue exists for these entities and the costs and benefits of feasible solutions.
BC29. A few comment letter respondents requested that the Board clarify whether the scope exception is intended to exclude joint ventures that have one or more investors that account for their interests in the joint venture using proportionate consolidation. One respondent recommended that the Board permit a joint venture that may be proportionately consolidated to apply the amendments in this Update. The Board decided that this scope exception is intended to exclude joint ventures in certain specialized industries in which the venturers can (but do not necessarily) account for their interests in a joint venture through proportionate consolidation. The Board’s rationale is that it did not want the joint venture to have to confirm how the venturers are accounting for their investments in the joint venture to determine whether the scope exception should be applied.
Not-for-Profit Entities
BC30. The amendments in this Update provide a scope exception for formations of entities determined to be not-for-profit entities (NFPs) in accordance with Topic 958, Not-for-Profit Entities. The Board decided to exclude NFPs from the amendments because NFPs could have unique considerations related to application of the guidance in Subtopic 958-805, Not-for-Profit Entities—Business Combinations, for determining whether a transaction or other event is a merger of NFPs or an acquisition by an NFP. Therefore, the Board determined that the expected costs and benefits of requiring NFPs to apply the amendments could be different from that for business entities. There were no comment letter respondents that expressed concern with the scope exception for NFPs.
Collaborative Arrangements
BC31. The proposed Update provided a scope exception for collaborative arrangements accounted for in accordance with Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements. A few comment letter respondents noted, however, that the guidance in paragraph 808-10-15-4 provides for collaborators to account for a separate legal entity that is part of a larger collaborative arrangement in accordance with other GAAP. Those respondents stated that if the separate legal entity meets the definition of a joint venture, the amendments in this Update should be applied. The Board concluded that a separate legal entity that meets the definition of a joint venture should be accounted for in accordance with the amendments in this Update. Therefore, the amendments provide a scope exception for collaborative arrangements accounted for in accordance with Topic 808 except for any part of the arrangement that is conducted in a separate legal entity that meets the definition of a joint venture.

Application of a New Basis of Accounting in Joint Venture Formations

BC32. The Board decided that a joint venture will be required to apply a new basis of accounting upon formation, which the Board considers to be broadly consistent with identifying the newly formed joint venture (rather than one of the contributed businesses) as the acquirer. The Board decided this because identifying an acquirer is inconsistent with the accounting requirements of the venturers.
BC33. Under the current guidance for business combinations, a new entity formed to effect a business combination is not necessarily the acquirer. Furthermore, the merger of two existing businesses results in only one of the two existing businesses being remeasured in accordance with the guidance in Topic 805 because one of the two existing businesses will be identified as the acquirer. As a result, some questioned whether a joint venture that is formed through the contributions of two or more businesses would be required to measure all of the businesses at fair value or whether one of the existing businesses would be the “acquirer” that would continue to record its assets at previous carrying amounts.
BC34. Under the amendments in this Update, the formation of a joint venture is the creation of a new reporting entity (not necessarily the creation of a new legal entity), which consists of contributed assets and liabilities (and potentially businesses) controlled by that reporting entity. Therefore, the amendments require that the contributed net assets be measured at fair value upon formation (with exceptions to fair value measurement that are consistent with the business combinations guidance), including when a joint venture is formed through the contributions of two or more businesses.
BC35. The Board decided to refer to this method as applying a new basis of accounting, rather than to designate the joint venture as the acquirer, because the Board does not want to influence the current practice for identifying an acquirer in Topic 805 by unnecessarily using the term acquirer in the context of joint venture formations.
BC36. A few comment letter respondents suggested an alternative measurement and recognition approach (referred to as the contribution-by-contribution approach) that would have required all contributions from a venturer to a joint venture, whether contributed at formation or after formation, to be accounted for by the joint venture:
  1. At fair value on the date the joint venture obtains control of the net assets using the fair value of the investor’s interests received (or retained) in the joint venture as the purchase price to allocate to the contributed assets
  2. According to their nature—either as an asset acquisition or a business combination.

BC37. Those comment letter respondents suggested this approach to reduce judgment required in applying certain amendments, such as in determining the formation date and what is part of the formation transaction. The Board considered this approach but ultimately did not support it because it would have expanded the scope and objective of the amendments in this Update beyond the formation of a joint venture. Throughout the course of this project, the Board decided not to address subsequent transactions because current GAAP exists for those transactions. The Board acknowledged that judgment is required in applying the amendments; however, that judgment is similar to the judgment required in applying the business combinations guidance, which is well understood and generally operable. Therefore, the Board concluded that expanding the scope of the amendments beyond the formation of a joint venture is not a pervasive financial reporting improvement that is needed at this time.
BC38. The remainder of this section describes the Board’s considerations and decisions for how a joint venture will be required to apply a new basis of accounting upon formation, including key similarities and differences to the business combinations guidance.
Formation Date and What Constitutes a Formation Transaction
BC39. The joint venture formation is the date that a joint venture uses to initially measure its net assets in its separate financial statements, similar to the acquisition date in a business combination, and determines when a joint venture applies the amendments in this Update. The amendments define the term formation date in the Master Glossary as the date on which an entity initially meets the definition of a joint venture. In addition, the amendments clarify that:
  1. The joint venture formation date is not necessarily the legal entity formation date.
  2. The joint venture formation date is the measurement date for the formation transaction.
  3. If multiple arrangements are accounted for as a single transaction that establishes the formation of a joint venture, the formation date is the measurement date for all arrangements that form part of the single formation transaction.

BC40. For describing what arrangements establish the formation of a joint venture and constitute a formation transaction, the Board acknowledged that practice often refers to the factors in paragraph 810-10-40-6 to determine when multiple arrangements should be accounted for as a single transaction. Although the guidance in that paragraph specifically relates to a parent entity’s loss of a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary, some nonauthoritative sources reference those factors in the context of business combinations to determine whether multiple arrangements should be accounted for as a single transaction. Therefore, the Board decided that similar factors will help stakeholders distinguish between contributions made upon formation and subsequent contributions. The amendments in this Update include those factors.
BC41. The Board decided to define formation date and describe what constitutes a formation transaction to serve two purposes. First, the amendments in this Update related to formation clarify which contributions are considered part of the formation transaction and which transactions are subsequent transactions. Second, the amendments related to determining the formation date clarify on which date a joint venture initially measures its net assets in its separate financial statements. Comment letter respondents indicated that the proposed definition would be operable for most joint venture formations and that the guidance on multiple arrangements will help identify the formation date for more complex joint venture formations.
BC42. The Board considered an alternative definition of formation date that would have specified that the formation date occurs when an entity has control of the assets necessary to begin operating in accordance with its purpose (and initially meets the definition of a joint venture). During initial deliberations, the Board ultimately dismissed this alternative because it would have added undue complexity and introduced the potential for additional interpretive issues, including how to account for assets and liabilities contributed before meeting the alternative definition of formation date. However, some Board members and comment letter respondents preferred the alternative definition because, in their view, it would better avoid outcomes in which a formation date would be established for a joint venture that has few or no substantive operations. Those Board members also noted that the concept of purpose exists in the current joint venture definition and should be familiar to stakeholders. Approximately one-third of comment letter respondents supported the alternative definition of formation date because they said it may provide a more relevant measurement date as compared with the proposed definition, while another one-third of comment letter respondents did not support the alternative definition because it would add undue complexity. Most respondents that supported the alternative definition requested that the Board provide implementation guidance and illustrative examples to apply that definition when assets are contributed on different dates.
BC43. Consistent with this feedback, Board members were concerned that incorporating the concepts of control and purpose would increase the subjectivity of interpreting the definition and add undue complexity. Therefore, the Board decided on a simplified definition of formation date to avoid diversity in practice.
In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D)
BC44. To align the requirements for IPR&D contributed to a joint venture upon formation and acquired through a business combination, the amendments in this Update require that a joint venture capitalize contributed tangible and intangible research and development assets. That requirement applies regardless of whether those assets have an alternative future use. After formation, a joint venture is required to account for IPR&D intangible assets as indefinite lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts, while it is required to account for tangible assets that are used in research and development activities in accordance with their nature.
BC45. On the basis of stakeholder feedback, the Board understands that assets associated with IPR&D can represent a significant portion of the overall assets contributed to a research-oriented joint venture. In those instances, recognizing the cost attributable to IPR&D as an immediate expense would make a joint venture’s formation accounting inconsistent with the business combinations guidance. Most comment letter respondents supported this guidance, and some also indicated that it is less likely in a joint venture formation than in a business combination that venturers would contribute IPR&D to a joint venture that is not expected to have a potential future benefit to the joint venture. Other comment letter respondents disagreed with recognizing IPR&D assets when a joint venture is not determined to be a business, citing that it would be inconsistent with the guidance in Topic 805. Ultimately, the Board decided to require the recognition of IPR&D assets contributed to a joint venture regardless of whether the joint venture is determined to be a business. Board members acknowledged that the recognition of IPR&D assets is consistent with the accounting for a business combination that serves as the underlying principle when recognizing and initially measuring the net assets contributed upon a joint venture formation. Additionally, some Board members supported the guidance because it will (a) improve the decision usefulness of the information presented in a joint venture’s financial statements and (b) reduce basis differences between a joint venture and its venturers.
Goodwill
Recognition
BC46. The amendments in this Update require that a joint venture recognize as goodwill the fair value of the joint venture as a whole in excess of identifiable net assets upon formation, if any. This requirement applies regardless of whether a joint venture, or the net assets contributed to a joint venture upon formation, meets the definition of a business in accordance with Topic 805.
BC47. The Board considered whether the recognition of goodwill should be limited to a joint venture that meets the definition of a business upon formation. That is, the Board considered whether a joint venture that does not meet the definition of a business upon formation should account for the fair value of the joint venture as a whole in excess of the amounts recognized for its identifiable net assets in accordance with the guidance for asset acquisitions in Subtopic 805-50, Business Combinations—Related Issues. Approximately half of comment letter respondents supported the amendments in this Update because (a) it would be infrequent for goodwill to be present if the joint venture was not a business and (b) requiring a departure from the business combinations guidance would result in additional cost and complexity to assess whether the joint venture meets the definition of a business. The other half of respondents disagreed with the recognition of goodwill when a joint venture is not determined to be a business, citing that it would be inconsistent with the guidance in Topic 805.
BC48. Similar to the comment letter respondents that supported the amendments for the recognition of goodwill, the Board expects that it will be unusual that an entity simultaneously (a) meets the definition of a joint venture, (b) has net assets with a fair value that more than insignificantly exceeds that of its identifiable net assets, and (c) is not a business. The Board expects that before a joint venture recognizes goodwill, the joint venture will ensure that it has correctly identified all of the contributed identifiable net assets and that all available information as of the formation date has been considered when measuring those identifiable net assets and the joint venture as a whole. In other words, the Board does not expect that an entity that meets the definition of a joint venture will have more than an insignificant amount of goodwill if it does not already meet the definition of a business. The Board’s expectation is consistent with the guidance in paragraph 805-10-55-9, which indicates that the presence of more than an insignificant amount of goodwill may be an indicator that an acquired set of assets may be a business.
BC49. Therefore, the Board decided that goodwill recognition at joint venture formation should be consistent with goodwill recognition in a business combination, rather than providing separate guidance for scenarios that may occur infrequently. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, the Board acknowledged that in the uncommon situation in which a joint venture does not satisfy the definition of a business, a more than insignificant amount of goodwill is present, and the entity has no operating segments or reporting units, the joint venture will default to testing goodwill at the entity level.
BC50. The amendments in this Update require that “negative goodwill” at the time of formation be recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital or other similar equity account, such as members’ equity. Even though the Board noted that the likelihood for negative goodwill to be present in a joint venture formation is low, the Board concluded that specific guidance would be beneficial to increase consistency of application. The Board decided that an adjustment to equity would be the least complex to apply and will result in the most relevant financial information.
Measurement
BC51. The amendments in this Update require that a joint venture measure goodwill, upon formation, as the calculated difference between the joint venture’s total net assets and its identifiable net assets. As further clarified in paragraph 805-60-30-2, the amendments require that a joint venture measure its total net assets upon formation as the fair value of the joint venture as a whole, which equals the fair value of 100 percent of a joint venture’s equity (net assets) immediately following formation, including any noncontrolling interest in the net assets recognized by the joint venture. The Board decided that this method of recognizing and initially measuring total net assets would be most appropriate for applying a new basis of accounting because it can be applied consistently to joint venture formations, irrespective of how they are legally structured. Comment letter respondents generally supported the measurement of goodwill and did not raise significant operability or auditing concerns.
BC52. The Board considered an alternative measurement approach that would have required that a joint venture identify the consideration transferred to acquire the businesses and net assets contributed to it by the venturers upon formation. The Board decided that measuring the fair value of the joint venture as a whole—100 percent of a joint venture’s equity (net assets) immediately following formation—would be more representationally faithful and a more straightforward approach for measuring the total net assets and goodwill of a joint venture upon formation.
Determining What Is Part of the Joint Venture Formation
BC53. The amendments in this Update require that a joint venture determine whether certain arrangements between the joint venture and the venturers are part of the joint venture formation or are separate transactions. If a transaction is part of a joint venture formation, it may affect the assets, liabilities, and equity recognized by the joint venture upon formation. By contrast, a transaction that is separate from a joint venture formation is required to be accounted for in accordance with other applicable GAAP. Approximately half of comment letter respondents generally supported the amendments for determining what is part of the joint venture formation, while others requested additional clarification on how to determine what is part of a joint venture formation. The Board decided not to provide additional guidance because the amendments refer to the business combinations guidance, which is widely applied and well understood.
BC54. The Board considered the types of arrangements that a joint venture would have to analyze to determine whether they are separate transactions or part of the joint venture formation. Because of the relationship of a joint venture to its venturers, the Board noted that there are several scenarios in which the joint venture may be required to provide payment to its venturers contingent either upon the provision of goods or services to the joint venture or upon the outcome of a future event. For those types of arrangements, the amendments in this Update refer to Topic 805, which discusses whether arrangements that include contingent payments to employees or to selling shareholders should be accounted for as part of a business combination.
BC55. A few respondents suggested that the Board provide a principle for determining the transactions that are part of the joint venture formation, similar to the guidance in paragraphs 805-10-55-18 and 805-10-55-20 through 55-21. That guidance includes understanding the reasons for the transaction, who initiated the transaction, and the timing of the transaction. The Board noted that in some cases the principle in paragraph 805-10-55-18 either does not appear relevant to the specific circumstances of a joint venture formation or does not provide additional clarity beyond what is in the amendments in this Update. Therefore, the Board decided not to provide additional guidance beyond the guidance in paragraphs 805-60-25-6 through 25-9.
BC56. To help joint ventures determine what is part of the joint venture formation, the amendments in this Update provide additional context on how to apply the guidance in Topic 805 for determining which transactions are separate from (or part of) the joint venture formation. The amendments specify that the joint venture is the functional equivalent of the acquirer, the venturers are the functional equivalent of selling shareholders, and the collective contributed assets or businesses are the functional equivalent of an acquiree.
BC57. By contrast, the Board decided that the guidance for preexisting relationships and acquisition-related costs in Topic 805 is not relevant in the context of a joint venture formation because the joint venture is accounted for as the formation of a new reporting entity whose history begins on that formation date. Therefore, the amendments in this Update prohibit a joint venture from applying the guidance in Subtopic 805-10 for settling a preexisting relationship and accounting for acquisition-related costs. A few respondents suggested that the Board either permit entities to analogize to this guidance or provide clarification of how those transactions should be accounted for in a joint venture formation. The Board decided not to provide additional guidance because these transactions are not relevant to a joint venture formation, as the joint venture does not exist before its formation date.
Contingent Payments
BC58. The Board acknowledged that a joint venture formation may involve an arrangement that is similar to a contingent consideration arrangement entered into as part of a business combination. For example, upon formation, a joint venture might promise to make payments or issue additional equity interests to a venturer contingent upon the performance of assets or businesses contributed by that venturer.
BC59. However, because the joint venture’s total net assets (including goodwill) are measured on the basis of the joint venture as a whole upon formation instead of consideration transferred, the Board observed that it may be challenging to identify contingent consideration arrangements as they are defined in Subtopic 805-30, Business Combinations—Goodwill or Gain from Bargain Purchase, Including Consideration Transferred.
BC60. Furthermore, while the Board observed that the intended accounting outcomes may be reached and consistent practice may develop for accounting for contingent payments in joint venture formations without specific guidance, stakeholder feedback indicated that it may be challenging to determine the required accounting if more specific guidance was not provided.
BC61. Therefore, for liability-classified (or asset-classified) instruments, the amendments in this Update require that any contingent arrangements deemed to be part of the joint venture formation and classified within liabilities follow the guidance in Subtopic 805-20. In reaching that decision, the Board concluded that if the contingent arrangement is generated as a result of the joint venture formation, it should not be accounted for as contingent consideration or as an assumed contingent consideration arrangement.
BC62. The Board acknowledged that the accounting for liability-classified (or asset-classified) contingent payments in a joint venture formation may result in an outcome different from the outcome under the contingent consideration guidance in Subtopic 805-30, which requires initial and subsequent measurement at fair value. Applying the exceptions to the fair value principle in Subtopic 805-20 (including for contingencies) may result in some arrangements that are similar to contingent consideration that are (a) not initially measured at fair value or (b) not subsequently measured at fair value with gains or losses recognized in earnings. A few respondents requested additional guidance for liability-classified contingent payments, such as illustrative examples. The Board decided not to provide additional guidance for contingent payments because the terms and conditions of those payments vary and additional guidance, such as illustrative examples, could have unintended consequences.
BC63. For any equity-classified instruments and contracts recognized separately upon formation, the amendments in this Update clarify that amounts recognized by a joint venture upon formation will not increase total net assets, goodwill, or equity but, instead, will be accounted for as a reallocation of additional paid-in capital (or other similar equity account, such as members’ equity).
Replacement Share-Based Payment Awards
BC64. The Board acknowledged that a joint venture may issue replacement share-based payment awards to the grantees of the contributed entities in connection with a joint venture formation, although stakeholders provided mixed feedback on the prevalence of those arrangements.
BC65. Because the amendments in this Update do not use the concept of consideration transferred in the context of a joint venture formation, the amendments refer to the guidance for replacement share-based payments in Topic 805 (consistent with existing guidance in Subtopic 805-20) and illustrate how those requirements are applied by a newly formed joint venture. The resulting effect of equity-classified share-based payment awards on total net assets, goodwill, and equity are consistent with the effect of any equity-classified instruments and contracts recognized separately upon formation, as described in paragraph BC63. Comment letter respondents were generally supportive of the amendments for replacement share-based payment awards.
Measurement Period
BC66. The measurement period in a business combination is the period after the acquisition date when the acquirer is permitted to adjust the provisional amounts recognized if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the business combination occurs. The measurement period allows the acquirer to take reasonable time to obtain the information necessary to identify and measure any of the following as of the acquisition date in accordance with the requirements of Topic 805:
  1. The identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree
  2. The consideration transferred for the acquiree (or the other amount used in measuring goodwill)
  3. In a business combination achieved in stages, the equity interest in the acquiree previously held by the acquirer
  4. The resulting goodwill recognized or the gain on a bargain purchase recognized.

BC67. Historically, as noted in the basis for conclusions in Statement 141(R), the Board decided to allow measurement period adjustments for business combinations to address concerns about the quality and availability of information at the acquisition date, including concerns about measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies.
BC68. On the basis of feedback received from practitioners before the issuance of the proposed Update, the Board initially decided that a joint venture would be prohibited from applying the measurement period guidance in accordance with Subtopic 805-10 to the amounts recognized upon formation. Those stakeholders indicated that a measurement period should be unnecessary because joint ventures, in their view, generally would have sufficient information available to recognize and measure their net assets upon formation without the use of a measurement period. Therefore, the Board did not identify significant benefits of permitting measurement period adjustments for joint venture formations beyond creating consistency with the business combinations guidance.
BC69. However, comment letter respondents indicated that joint ventures may need additional time to measure the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities and the joint venture as a whole in calculating goodwill, especially if the joint venture is formed at or near the end of a reporting period. Those respondents explained that additional valuations may be needed to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities contributed to the joint venture because the level of precision required by the joint venture’s accounting is different from that of the venturers. Additionally, there could be challenges associated with identifying and measuring individual intangible assets as of the formation date.
BC70. The Board agreed with comment letter respondents and decided to allow a joint venture to apply the measurement period guidance in accordance with Subtopic 805-10 upon formation. The Board acknowledged that the benefits of permitting a measurement period for joint venture formations justify any additional complexity and judgment that result from permitting the use of a measurement period.
Transfers of Financial Assets
BC71. Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, addresses whether a transfer of financial assets represents (a) a sale (because the transferor has given up control of financial assets) or (b) a secured borrowing in which control is retained by the transferor. The amendments in this Update require that if a venturer transfers financial assets that are within the scope of Subtopic 860-10, Transfers and Servicing—Overall, to a joint venture at formation, then the joint venture should determine whether the transfer results in the recognition of transferred financial assets by the joint venture by applying the guidance in Subtopic 860-10. The Board noted that this will improve alignment between the venturers that account for transfers of financial assets in accordance with Topic 860 and a joint venture that is the recipient of a transfer of financial assets.
BC72. A few comment letter respondents requested clarification of paragraph 860-10-40-5(b) and how the determination should be made in the context of a joint venture formation. Those respondents observed that there may be instances in which the joint venture does not meet the conditions in paragraph 860-10-40-5(b) because the venturer still has control over the assets and, therefore, is precluded from recognizing the transfer of financial assets as a sale, even if the joint venture legally owns the financial assets.
BC73. The Board noted that the objective of the amendments in this Update on transfers of financial assets is to align the accounting by a joint venture for financial assets transferred to the joint venture from the venturers with the accounting by the venturers that transferred those financial assets. Because of this, the amendments are not meant to definitively conclude that financial assets transferred to a joint venture at formation are either a secured borrowing or a sale. Moreover, the amendments are not intended to change how the venturers would account for a transfer of financial assets to the joint venture but rather to align the joint venture’s accounting with the venturers’ accounting. The Board notes that Subtopic 860-10 is based on the concept of control and that the venturers and the joint venture will have to evaluate the conditions as they would with any other transfer of financial assets in accordance with Topic 860. Therefore, the Board decided not to change the guidance in paragraph 860-10-40-5(b) in the context of a joint venture formation.
Disclosure
BC74. The amendments in this Update require that a joint venture disclose information that enables users of its financial statements to evaluate the accounting for the joint venture formation in the period in which the formation date occurs. To meet this disclosure objective, a joint venture will be required to provide the following disclosures about its formation transaction (in addition to measurement period disclosures, if applicable):
  1. The formation date
  2. A description of the purpose for which the joint venture was formed (for example, to share risks and rewards in developing a new market, product, or technology; to combine complementary technological knowledge; or to pool resources in developing production or other facilities)
  3. The formation-date fair value of the joint venture as a whole
  4. A description of the assets and liabilities recognized by the joint venture at the formation date
  5. The amounts recognized by the joint venture for each major class of assets and liabilities as a result of accounting for its formation, either presented on the face of financial statements or disclosed in the notes to financial statements
  6. A qualitative description of the factors that make up any goodwill recognized, such as expected synergies from combining operations of the contributed assets or businesses, intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, or other factors.

BC75. The Board considered requiring that a joint venture provide the same disclosures as an acquirer of a business in accordance with Topic 805. However, after considering that joint ventures often are private entities and their investors may have greater access to management, the Board ultimately decided that the benefits of requiring full business combination disclosures would not justify the costs.
BC76. The Board also considered including a disclosure objective without a list of required disclosures, which would have required that a joint venture use its discretion to determine what disclosures should be provided. The Board dismissed that approach because it preferred to require the disclosure of certain information.
BC77. The Board ultimately decided that an objective and a brief list would be the best approach. The Board anticipates that a joint venture will be able to prepare the list of required disclosures using readily available information with minimal costs and that the disclosures will provide a user with decision-useful information about the joint venture formation.
BC78. Comment letter respondents did not raise any significant concerns with the required disclosures.

Alternative Measurement Approaches Considered

BC79. The Board considered two alternative measurement approaches—the carrying amount measurement approach and the optionality measurement approach (allowing an option to either use the carrying amount measurement approach or apply a new basis of accounting). Nearly all comment letter respondents did not support these approaches but supported fair value measurement as required by the amendments in this Update. Those alternative approaches are discussed in detail in paragraphs BC80–BC90. The Board ultimately did not support those approaches for one or both of the following reasons:
  1. Aligning the accounting required for joint ventures and the venturers to reduce or eliminate differences in the basis of the joint venture’s financial statements when compared with the reported investment by the venturers was preferred.
  2. Requiring a new basis of accounting for joint venture formation transactions would provide more decision-useful information to users of joint venture financial statements than information produced by the other measurement alternatives.

Carrying Amount Measurement Approach
BC80. The Board considered the carrying amount measurement approach, which would have required that a joint venture account for the receipt of net assets contributed by a venturer at the carrying amounts reflected in the accounts of the venturer at the date of transfer.
BC81. Those that supported this alternative approach stated that the venturers’ carrying amounts are the most relevant measurements. Specifically, the venturers’ carrying amounts help the venturers—who generally are the primary users of the joint venture’s financial statements—analyze historical trends by comparing the current profitability of a particular asset with its profitability in the past when it was controlled by the contributing venturer. Supporters of a carrying amount approach also stated that it would be the least costly approach for certain assets that have minimal or zero carrying amounts, such as internally developed intangible assets or depreciated buildings, because determining the fair value of these assets could be challenging and costly.
BC82. However, stakeholders and some Board members were concerned that the use of the venturers’ carrying amounts would result in the joint venture not recognizing certain assets upon formation. Additionally, others expressed concerns that a carrying amount approach would result in situations in which the initial assets and equity recorded by the joint venture would be less than the fair value of the assets received and equity interests exchanged. Those situations would affect important metrics, such as return on invested capital and return on assets, in the periods following formation. Therefore, the joint venture’s future economic returns would not be based on information about the fair value of the contributed assets.
BC83. Furthermore, some Board members were concerned that the use of carrying amounts and the resulting differences between a venturer’s and the joint venture’s basis could obscure whether earnings or losses recognized by the joint venture are attributable to the contributing venturer’s activities before formation or to the joint venture’s activities after formation. For example, by recording assets and liabilities at the venturers’ carrying amounts, a joint venture may report greater net income postformation than it would have if a new basis of accounting had been applied. Some Board members note that this difference in postformation net income results from embedded gains that were generated by the venturers but not recognized by them before the joint venture’s formation. In the Board’s view, the differences between a venturer’s and the joint venture’s basis would not be decision useful in cases in which the venturer is required to provide the joint venture’s separate financial statements in a regulatory filing (for example, because the joint venture is a significant equity method investee of the venturer).
BC84. The Board ultimately did not support this approach because it would not have significantly reduced costs for preparers, it would have required the presentation of information that some Board members said is less decision useful, and it could have resulted in significant differences between the initial accounting by the joint venture and its venturers.
Optionality Measurement Approach (Carrying Amount or Fair Value)
BC85. The Board also considered an optionality measurement approach, which would have allowed a joint venture to make a policy election to account for the receipt of all contributions at either the venturers’ carrying amounts or fair value.
BC86. Overall, those that supported optionality expressed that because the venturers may be the only initial users of a joint venture’s financial statements, the venturers are in the best position to decide on the initial measurement of the joint venture’s net assets depending on their expected costs and benefits. Furthermore, supporters of this approach cited one or more of the following:
  1. The application of pushdown accounting is optional. Some stakeholders viewed optionality as being similar to an acquiree’s option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements when an acquirer obtains control of the acquiree in accordance with Subtopic 805-50.
  2. A fair value measurement may necessitate additional valuations of identifiable assets and liabilities. Those supporting optionality noted that the valuations performed for negotiation purposes might consider only the fair value of the total contributions made to the joint venture by each venturer. They expressed concern that, to comply with a fair value requirement, an additional valuation would be needed to obtain information about the fair value of the joint venture’s identifiable assets and liabilities.
  3. Equity method basis differences created by use of a carrying amount approach may not be material to the venturers. Existing guidance for equity method investors requires that a venturer account for a difference between the cost of an equity method investment and the amount of underlying equity in net assets of an investee as if the investee were a consolidated subsidiary and a venturer allocates those basis differences to the identifiable net assets and/or goodwill. However, those supporting optionality asserted that equity method basis differences arising from a carrying amount approach may be immaterial to venturers. In those cases, a fair value requirement could be more costly than a carrying amount approach and the venturers, as financial statement users, may not agree that any benefits of the fair value information would justify those additional costs.
  4. Optionality would clarify requirements for newly formed joint ventures. Some practitioners have pointed to nonauthoritative sources asserting that there are limitations to when a newly formed joint venture can measure its net assets at fair value upon formation. Those supporting optionality argued that explicitly allowing an option would reduce the uncertainty caused by the lack of specific authoritative guidance and would allow newly formed joint ventures to use fair value if they chose to do so.

BC87. The Board reasoned that a joint venture’s separate financial statements represent general purpose financial statements and therefore also should consider the needs of users beyond the venturers. Other users would include potential investors, creditors, and others that cannot require that the joint venture provide information directly to them and must rely on its general purpose financial reporting. The Board was sympathetic to the extent of costs that venturers incur in preparing joint venture financial statements but did not accept the premise that the venturers are the only users of joint venture financial statements whose needs should be considered.
BC88. The Board ultimately did not support this approach because optionality would have allowed entities to choose to present less decision-useful information in the joint venture’s financial statements. Board members expressed concern that permitting a carrying amount approach (a) would result in the omission of important financial information about the formation of a joint venture and (b) would not eliminate or reduce differences in the basis of the joint venture’s financial statements when compared with the reported investment by the venturers. Additionally, the Board concluded that the optionality alternative would not have reduced costs and diversity in practice sufficiently to make it preferable to a fair value requirement.
BC89. Therefore, the Board decided that allowing optionality would not achieve the project objective of reducing diversity in practice. The Board also was concerned that, compared with providing no new guidance, allowing optionality would result in preparers incurring additional costs to interpret and apply any new guidance established without reducing diversity in practice.
BC90. Under existing guidance, an acquiree has an option to apply pushdown accounting each time there is a change-in-control event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquiree. The Board determined that because the venturers have joint control over the joint venture, rather than either of the venturers having a controlling financial interest, it would be inappropriate to consider the venturers as analogous to an acquirer in a business combination and the joint venture as analogous to an acquiree. Therefore, the Board concluded that providing an option to a newly formed joint venture that was similar to pushdown accounting would be inappropriate. Instead, the Board decided that the joint venture itself is more similar to an acquirer than to an acquiree because the joint venture gains control of the net assets contributed to it as part of the formation transaction, while no entity gains control of the joint venture.

Definition of a Joint Venture

BC91. This project was added by the Board to address a specific agenda request related to the accounting for joint venture formation transactions. Nevertheless, outside the definition in the Master Glossary and certain SEC staff guidance, including comments made by the SEC Observer included in EITF Issue 98-4 (see paragraph 845-10-S99-2) who stated that the SEC staff would object to a conclusion that joint control is the only defining characteristic of a joint venture, there is no guidance in the Codification that describes how to distinguish a joint venture from similar entities or arrangements. Practitioners and preparers said that they experience challenges in interpreting and applying the current joint venture definition. Stakeholders said that, over time, interpretations in practice of what constitutes a joint venture have developed and practice is generally able to apply the definition as it exists today, albeit with questions about specific aspects of the definition. The Board considered as part of this Update whether it should amend the definition of a joint venture to clarify its application.
BC92. Comment letter feedback was similar to feedback received before the issuance of the proposed Update—that the definition can generally be applied but that there is some judgment and diversity in practice in applying that definition. While a majority of comment letter respondents indicated that the definition of a joint venture should be amended, there was no clear consensus among respondents on how it should be amended or the priority of doing so. Several comment letter respondents, as well as Board members, expressed concern that modifying the joint venture definition, for example, to incorporate the concept of joint control, would result in significant interpretive questions and may have an unintended consequence of changing the population of joint ventures, which was not an objective of the amendments in this Update.
BC93. Despite questions about the definition, stakeholders throughout the course of this project and comment letter respondents requested that the Board provide measurement guidance, even if the definition was not revised, to address the longstanding lack of guidance related to measurement upon joint venture formation. Comment letter respondents supported the expeditious finalization of the proposed amendments, given the expected benefits of the proposed guidance, and the deferral of any changes to the joint venture definition to a potential future project.
BC94. Ultimately, the Board decided to retain the definition of joint venture as it currently appears in the Master Glossary. The Board observed that it appears that practice generally can apply the current definition and that amending the joint venture definition is beyond the objective of the amendments in this Update. Therefore, there are no amendments to the joint venture definition in this Update.

Effective Date and Transition

BC95. The amendments in this Update are effective prospectively for all joint venture formations with a formation date on or after January 1, 2025. A joint venture is permitted to early adopt the amendments in any interim or annual period in which financial statements have not yet been issued (or made available for issuance). Almost all comment letter respondents indicated that entities should not need a significant amount of time to prepare for adoption because the amendments are aligned with Topic 805, which is widely applied and understood. Therefore, the Board concluded that the effective date should provide sufficient time for entities to understand and apply the amendments, considering their narrow scope and transaction-based nature. Additionally, all respondents that provided feedback on whether early adoption should be permitted indicated that it should be permitted.
BC96. Some respondents provided feedback on whether entities other than public business entities would need more time than public business entities to implement the amendments in this Update. Half of those respondents indicated that entities other than public business entities should have one additional year for implementation. The other half of respondents indicated that all joint ventures should have the same amount of time to implement the amendments because most joint ventures are not public business entities. Considering the effective date and that joint ventures are not typically public business entities, the Board decided against a different effective date for entities other than public business entities.
BC97. The amendments in this Update require prospective application for joint ventures formed on or after the effective date. In addition, a joint venture that was formed before the effective date of the amendments may elect to apply the amendments retrospectively if the joint venture has sufficient information. If a joint venture elects to apply the amendments retrospectively, for any guidance in Subtopic 805-60 that is the same as that in the business combinations guidance, the joint venture will have to apply the business combinations guidance that existed at the date of its formation. For example, a joint venture formed in 2018 would apply Subtopic 805-20 as it existed in 2018. A joint venture that elects to early adopt the amendments is permitted to do so prospectively or retrospectively. A joint venture that elects to apply the amendments retrospectively is required to provide transition disclosures in Subtopic 250-10, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—Overall.
BC98. A majority of respondents supported the transition guidance. Those respondents noted that optionality allows an entity to weigh the benefits of retrospective application against its additional costs. The respondents that disagreed with the transition guidance generally noted that retrospective application may require significant effort and may present additional challenges and, thus, recommended eliminating the option for retrospective application.
BC99. The Board decided to not require that existing joint ventures apply the amendments in this Update retrospectively because it determined that the expected costs of retrospective application may not justify the expected benefits to investors and that some joint ventures may have insufficient information. No respondents expressed support for requiring retrospective application.
BC100. The Board also considered but rejected an approach that would have allowed only joint ventures formed on or after the effective date of the amendments in this Update to apply the new guidance, which would have prohibited existing joint ventures from applying the guidance retrospectively. The Board decided that comparability and decision usefulness would be enhanced for any joint ventures that have sufficient information and elect to apply the guidance retrospectively.

Amendments to the GAAP Taxonomy

The amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification® in this Accounting Standards Update require improvements to the GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy and SEC Reporting Taxonomy (collectively referred to as the “GAAP Taxonomy”). Those improvements, which will be incorporated into the proposed 2024 GAAP Taxonomy, are available through GAAP Taxonomy Improvements provided at www.fasb.org, and finalized as part of the annual release process.
Expand Expand
Resize
Tools
Rcl

Welcome to Viewpoint, the new platform that replaces Inform. Once you have viewed this piece of content, to ensure you can access the content most relevant to you, please confirm your territory.

signin option menu option suggested option contentmouse option displaycontent option contentpage option relatedlink option prevandafter option trending option searchicon option search option feedback option end slide