If a parent loses control of a subsidiary that is a business through means other than a nonreciprocal transfer to owners, it must:
- derecognize the assets (including an appropriate allocation of goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary at their carrying amounts at the date control is lost,
- derecognize the carrying amount of any NCI at the date control is lost (including any components of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to it),
- recognize the fair value of the proceeds from the transaction, event, or circumstances that resulted in the loss of control,
- recognize any noncontrolling investment retained in the former subsidiary at its fair value at the date control is lost,
- reclassify to income the amounts recognized in other comprehensive income in relation to that subsidiary, and
- recognize any resulting difference as a gain or loss in income attributable to the parent.
The gain or loss is calculated as the difference between (a) and (b):
- The aggregate of:
- the fair value of the consideration received,
- the fair value of any retained noncontrolling investment in the former subsidiary on the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated, and
- the carrying amount of any noncontrolling interest in the former subsidiary (including any accumulated other comprehensive income or loss attributable to the NCI) on the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated.
- The carrying amount of the former subsidiary’s net assets
The calculation outlined above, as described in
ASC 810-10-40-5, results in an amount that includes the gain or loss for both the interest sold and the noncontrolling investment retained. However, a parent is required to separately disclose the total gain or loss and the portion of the gain or loss related to the retained noncontrolling investment in accordance with
ASC 810-10-50-1B. To obtain the information necessary for disclosure, a second calculation of the portion related to the gain or loss on the retained noncontrolling investment is necessary. See Example BCG 5-14 and Example BCG 5-15 for an illustration of the calculation of the gain or loss on the retained noncontrolling interest.
It is also important to identify any gains or losses deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to the subsidiary. The cumulative amount deferred in other comprehensive income related to that subsidiary is considered part of the carrying amount of the subsidiary and is included in determining the gain or loss on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment in accordance with
ASC 810-10-40-4A. This includes the parent’s and the NCI’s share of gains or losses previously recognized in other comprehensive income.
Amounts recognized in equity (outside of accumulated other comprehensive income) related to changes in ownership interests that did not result in a change in control should not be included in determining the gain or loss on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment. These amounts resulted from transactions among shareholders and are not directly attributable to the NCI.
The effect of applying the steps above when a subsidiary that is a business is partially owned prior to the loss of control is that the noncontrolling interests held by third parties are not revalued to fair value. As part of the deconsolidation of the subsidiary, the carrying value of the NCI’s portion of the subsidiary’s net assets is derecognized against the carrying amount of the NCI, with no gain or loss.
A subsidiary to be deconsolidated may have redeemable NCI that the reporting entity accounted for as mezzanine equity in accordance with the guidance described in
BCG 6.2.1.4 and
FG 7.4.3.2. If accretion of that mezzanine NCI was required, the accretion would have been reflected in equity and would not have impacted net income. Accordingly, the carrying amount of the NCI used for purposes of determining the gain or loss on deconsolidation should not include those accretion adjustments. Rather, previously recorded accretion adjustments to the carrying amount of the NCI should be reversed prior to calculating the gain or loss on disposition by recording a credit to equity of the parent.
Typically, impairment tests for goodwill and long-lived assets (asset group) are needed when a parent expects that it will sell or lose control of a subsidiary. If the goodwill or long-lived asset group is impaired, the impairment loss should be recognized in earnings in accordance with
ASC 350-20 and
ASC 360-10-35, respectively.
Upon deconsolidation, the reporting entity should assess whether the deconsolidated subsidiary meets the criteria for discontinued operations and consider the applicability of the presentation and disclosure requirements for discontinued operations in accordance with
ASC 205-20. See
FSP 27 for additional information on discontinued operations.
Example BCG 5-14 and Example BCG 5-15 demonstrate the accounting for a change in interest when control is lost, assuming the transactions do not involve nonreciprocal transfers to owners.
EXAMPLE BCG 5-14Accounting for changes in interest of a wholly-owned subsidiary that is a business if control is lost
Company A owns 100% of a subsidiary that is a business. Company A disposes of 60% of its interest in the subsidiary for $360 million and loses control of the subsidiary. At the disposal date, the fair value of the retained noncontrolling investment is determined to be $240 million. The carrying value of the identifiable net assets is $500 million, including $60 million of goodwill recorded from when the subsidiary was previously acquired. (For illustrative purposes, the tax consequences on the gain have been ignored.)
How should Company A account for the change in interest?
Analysis
Company A should record the following journal entry on the disposal date to record the 60% interest sold, the gain recognized on the 40% retained noncontrolling investment, and the derecognition of the subsidiary (in millions):
Dr. Equity-method investment |
$240 1 |
|
Cr. Gain on investment |
|
$100 3 |
1 Fair value of the 40% retained noncontrolling investment is recognized
2 Deconsolidation of the subsidiary and removal of 100% of carrying value of the subsidiary’s net assets, including an appropriately allocated portion of previously recorded goodwill ($440 net assets excluding goodwill + $60 goodwill)
3 Gain or loss on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment is recognized in earnings, calculated as follows:
Fair value of consideration |
$360 |
Fair value of retained noncontrolling investment |
|
240 |
Carrying value of NCI |
|
n/a |
Less: carrying value of former subsidiary’s net assets ($440 net assets excluding goodwill + $60 goodwill) |
|
(500) |
Gain on interest sold and retained noncontrolling investment |
|
$100 |
The $100 million gain on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment would be recognized in earnings and disclosed in the financial statements. Additionally, Company A would need to disclose the portion of the gain or loss related to the remeasurement of the retained noncontrolling investment to fair value. This amount is calculated as follows (in millions):
Fair value of retained noncontrolling investment |
$240 |
Percentage retained of carrying value of subsidiary (($440 + $60) x 40%) |
(200) |
Gain on retained noncontrolling investment |
$40 |
EXAMPLE BCG 5-15
Accounting for changes in interest of a partially-owned subsidiary when control is lost
Company B owns 80% of a subsidiary that is a business. Company B disposes of 50% of the subsidiary for $300 million and loses control of the subsidiary. Company B will deconsolidate the subsidiary and account for the remaining 30% interest as an equity-method investment. At the disposal date, the fair value of the retained noncontrolling investment is determined to be $180 million. The carrying value of the identifiable net assets is $440 million and there is no goodwill. The carrying value of the 20% noncontrolling interests held by third parties prior to the transaction is $88 million. (For illustrative purposes, the tax consequences on the gain have been ignored.)
How should Company B reflect the change in interest?
Analysis
Company B would record the following journal entry on the disposal date to record the 50% interest sold, the gain recognized on the 30% retained noncontrolling investment, and the derecognition of the subsidiary (in millions):
Dr. Equity-method investment |
$180 1 |
|
Cr. Gain on investment |
|
$128 3 |
1 Fair value of the 30% retained noncontrolling investment is recognized
2 Derecognition of the carrying value of the NCI
3 Gain or loss on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment is recognized in the income statement, calculated as follows:
Fair value of consideration |
|
$300 |
Fair value of retained noncontrolling investment |
|
180 |
Less: carrying value of former subsidiary’s net assets |
|
(440) |
Gain on interest sold and retained noncontrolling investment |
|
$128 |
The $128 million gain on the interest sold and the retained noncontrolling investment would be recognized in earnings and disclosed in the financial statements. Additionally, Company B would need to disclose the portion of the gain or loss related to the remeasurement of the retained noncontrolling investment to fair value. This amount is calculated as follows (in millions):
Fair value of retained noncontrolling investment |
$180 |
Percentage retained of carrying value of subsidiary ($440 × 30%) |
(132) |
Gain on retained noncontrolling investment |
$ 48 |
Question BCG 5-1
Is there a difference between (1) the gain recognized when an entity sells 100% of a consolidated subsidiary’s shares (that is a business) to an equity-method investee and (2) the gain recognized when an entity sells shares of a consolidated subsidiary to an unrelated party but retains an equity interest in the former subsidiary?
PwC response
The two transactions are substantively similar, and the accounting result should be similar. This is best understood by analyzing the following two scenarios. Assume a parent company owns 30% of Investee A and 100% of Subsidiary B and both entities are businesses. In one scenario, Parent sells 100% of Subsidiary B to Investee A. Investee A pays cash for 100% of Subsidiary B. Parent indirectly retains a 30% interest in Subsidiary B through its equity holding of Investee A. In another scenario, Parent sells 70% of Subsidiary B to an unrelated third party. In the first scenario, one could argue that a gain should be recognized on only the 70% interest in Subsidiary B that was not retained by Parent. However, even though Parent retains its 30% interest in Investee A, which now owns 100% of Subsidiary B, the Parent would recognize a gain or loss on the sale of the 100% interest sold in Subsidiary B, as there has been a change of control. In the second scenario, the Parent would recognize a gain or loss on the sale of the 70% interest sold, and a gain or loss on the remeasurement of the retained 30% noncontrolling investment in Subsidiary B. As a result, under both scenarios, the gain will be recognized upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary in accordance with the guidance in
ASC 810-10. Assuming similar facts and circumstances in the scenarios, an equal gain would result.