While most exchange rates fluctuate in accordance with the supply of and demand for foreign currencies, some countries have exchange controls that affect the availability of and exchange rates for foreign currencies. The degree of exchange controls can vary. When there is a high degree of exchange controls that are expected to continue for a period that is other than temporary, it may not be clear which exchange rate, if any, should be used for remeasurement and translation purposes. In such circumstances, transparent disclosure should be made concerning the reporting entity’s exposure (measured in the reporting currency) to the foreign currency in question and the exchange rates that are being utilized.
The IPTF meets and discusses significant issues with the SEC staff including exchange controls. The minutes for these meetings should be considered when assessing the impact of significant exchange controls.
A country may introduce a “preference” exchange rate or a “penalty” exchange rate for its currency. A preference rate is favorable when compared to other available rates; a penalty rate is unfavorable when compared to other available rates. Preferential or penalty rates are pre-determined rates, typically subject to specified requirements and available only for specified transactions, determined by a foreign government. A distinct and separable operation with foreign currency transactions in a currency of a foreign economy that has a preferential or penalty rate should assess its particular facts and circumstances to determine whether the transactions should be measured at either the preferential or penalty rate.
Items qualifying for a preference rate are usually items considered essential for the citizens of the country. A reporting entity usually has to apply for governmental approval to acquire the preference rate; approval is not guaranteed. Judgment may be required to assess, based on prior experience with a particular product in a particular country, whether a transaction will qualify for the preference rate. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than a foreign entity’s function currency that relate to transactions that qualify for the preference or penalty rate should generally be remeasured at the relevant preference or penalty rate because it reflects the amounts expected to be received or paid upon their collection or payment. However, the dividend remittance rate should generally be used to translate the financial statements of a foreign entity.
If an unsettled intercompany transaction is subject to and remeasured using a preference or penalty rate, using the dividend remittance rate for translation will result in a difference between intercompany receivables and payables. Example FX 5-6 illustrates this situation.
EXAMPLE FX 5-6Translating an intercompany transaction recorded using a preference rate
USA Corp is a US registrant that uses the US dollar (USD) as its reporting currency.
USA Corp has a consolidated subsidiary that is a foreign entity in which the functional currency is the local currency (LC).
USA Corp sells 3 units of inventory to the foreign entity at USD 100/per unit when the official rate that is used to pay dividends is 6.25 LC = 1 USD and there is a preference rate of 5.5 LC = 1 USD available for the importation of the inventory item. Upon importation, the inventory is immediately sold to a third party at a profit, but at period end, the intercompany balance between USA Corp and the foreign entity has not been settled.
How are the intercompany balance sheet accounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements of USA Corp?
Analysis
As a result of the intercompany sale of inventory, USA Corp should record an intercompany receivable of USD 300 while the foreign entity would measure its intercompany payable in its functional currency financial statements using the preference rate, which results in an intercompany payable of LC 1,650.
To translate the foreign entity’s financial statements into USD, USA Corp uses the official rate, which results in an intercompany payable of USD 264. Therefore, there would be a mismatch between the USD intercompany receivable (USD 300) on USA Corp’s books and the translated USD intercompany payable (USD 264) on the foreign entity’s books.
ASC 830-30-45-7 allows a reporting entity to record an additional receivable equal to this difference (USD 36), which reflects the USD amount of the exchange rate subsidy that the foreign government is effectively providing.
Unfortunately, not all multiple exchange rate problems can be satisfactorily solved by mechanical application of the approach described in Example FX 5-6, which is presumably why
ASC 830-30-45-6 refers to translation of foreign currency financial statements at the dividend remittance rate “in the absence of unusual circumstances.” The SEC staff has indicated that given certain facts and circumstances, it may be appropriate to translate a foreign entity’s financial statements using an exchange rate other than the dividend rate. However, deviations from the dividend remittance rate should occur only in situations in which there is significant distortion in exchange rates due to temporary and unusual economic factors, and would necessitate transparent disclosure.