Expand
The definition of the levels at which goodwill is assigned/allocated and tested for impairment varies between the two frameworks. Specifically, in determining the unit of account for goodwill impairment testing, US GAAP uses a segment reporting framework while IFRS focuses on the lowest level of identifiable cash inflows (cash generating unit) or groups of cash generating units at which goodwill is monitored.
Additional differences in the impairment testing methodologies could create further variability in the timing and extent of recognized impairment losses.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The change makes US GAAP more similar to IFRS because IFRS also has a single step for goodwill impairment. However, other differences remain.
The revised guidance was effective for public business entities that are SEC filers, excluding entities eligible to be smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC, for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years that began after December 15, 2019. All other entities that have not elected the goodwill alternative will be required to apply the guidance in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. Early adoption is permitted and must be applied to all goodwill impairment tests within that fiscal year. See BCG 9.1 for detailed guidance on effective dates.
US GAAP
IFRS
Goodwill is assigned to an entity’s reporting units, defined as the same as, or one level below, an operating segment. The determination of reporting units is based on a segment reporting structure.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that may indicate an impairment.
When performing the goodwill impairment test, an entity may first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the quantitative goodwill impairment test is necessary. If the entity determines, based on the qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount, the impairment test is performed. An entity can bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to the quantitative assessment.
Goodwill is allocated to a cash-generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs (not larger than an operating segment) based on how goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. A CGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows largely independently of other assets or groups of assets.
Goodwill is tested for impairment at least on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that may indicate an impairment.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed using a one-step approach:
The recoverable amount of the CGU or group of CGUs (i.e., the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use) is compared with its carrying amount.
Any impairment loss is recognized as the excess of the carrying amount over the recoverable amount.
Prior to adoption of ASU 2017-04, goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step test:
  • In Step 1, the fair value and the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill, are compared. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, Step 2 is completed to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment loss, if any.
  • Goodwill impairment is measured as the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over its implied fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill—calculated in the same manner that goodwill is determined in a business combination—is the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit and the fair value of the various assets and liabilities included in the reporting unit.
Any loss recognized is not permitted to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The impairment charge is included in operating income.
For reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity must first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. An entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists.
Private companies have the option to amortize goodwill on a straight-line basis over a period of up to ten years, and apply a trigger-based, single-step impairment test at either the entity level or the reporting unit level at the company’s election.
When testing a CGU to which goodwill has been allocated for impairment, there may be an impairment indicator related to an asset within the unit containing the goodwill. In such circumstances, the entity tests the asset for impairment first and recognizes any impairment loss for that asset, before testing the CGU containing the goodwill for impairment. Then, if there is an impairment loss on the CGU, the impairment loss is allocated first to goodwill and then on a pro rata basis to the other assets of the CGU or group of CGUs to the extent that the impairment loss exceeds the carrying value of goodwill.
Expand Expand
Resize
Tools
Rcl

Welcome to Viewpoint, the new platform that replaces Inform. Once you have viewed this piece of content, to ensure you can access the content most relevant to you, please confirm your territory.

signin option menu option suggested option contentmouse option displaycontent option contentpage option relatedlink option prevandafter option trending option searchicon option search option feedback option end slide