Many assets and liabilities are measured at present value for book purposes. This broad grouping includes many financial instruments (e.g., loans receivable and long-term debt), leases that are capitalized by the lessee or recorded as receivables by the lessor, most accruals for individual deferred compensation contracts, and OPEB obligations. We believe there are two basic approaches for scheduling the reversal of temporary differences related to assets and liabilities that are measured at present value: the loan amortization method and the present value method.
With respect to an asset or liability measured at present value, the aggregate future cash payments will exceed the principal balance at the balance sheet date, and the difference between the two scheduling methods involves the portion of future cash payments expected in each future year that is deemed to recover or settle the principal balance at the balance sheet date.
The two approaches are termed the loan amortization method and the present value method. Under the loan amortization method, future payments are considered to apply first to accrued interest, with the balance applied to principal. The application to principal would cause the reversal of the basis difference. Under this method, when payments are level, annual reversals will increase each year. This model mirrors the model used generally in financial statements in accounting for assets and liabilities measured at present value (i.e., the reversal amount for each future year will be the amount by which the recorded asset or liability is expected to be reduced in that year). The recorded asset (liability) may be expected to increase in a future year if the payments receivable (payable) in that year will be less than the interest income (expense) expected to accrue. Therefore, no reversal would be deemed to occur in that year.
The present value method assigns to each reversal year the present value at the balance sheet date of the payment to be made in that year. When payments are level, annual reversals will decrease each year. The present value method can be viewed as considering each required future payment as a separate zero-coupon asset or liability, with all interest accruing unpaid from the balance sheet date to the payment date. In contrast, the loan amortization method (and the financial statement model) emphasizes that the series of payments constitutes a single contract.
The results of the loan amortization method and the present value method are illustrated in Example TX 5-19.
EXAMPLE TX 5-19
Scheduling reversals of temporary differences—assets and liabilities measured at present value
On December 31, 20X1, Company X records an asset in the amount of $614,457. This amount represents the present value, using a 10% interest rate, of 10 payments due of $100,000 on December 31 of each of the next 10 years.
How would the reversal patterns differ under the loan amortization method vs. the present value method?
Analysis
The reversal for 20X2 under the loan amortization method would be based on the allocation of the 20X2 payment ($100,000) first to interest ($61,446) ($614,457 × 10%) and the remainder to principal ($38,554). A similar allocation would be made for each subsequent year.
In contrast, under the present value method, the reversal assigned to 20X2 would be the present value at December 31, 20X1 of the payment to be made on December 31, 20X2, which is calculated to be $90,909. A similar calculation would be made for each subsequent year using a present value formula (not shown in this example).
The reversal patterns under the two methods would be as follows:
Year |
Loan amortization |
|
Present value |
Note that when the asset or liability requires a series of level payments from the balance sheet date until liquidation, the reversal pattern derived under the loan amortization method is the exact reverse of that derived under the present value method.
It generally will be easier to apply the loan amortization method because the reversal amounts are usually consistent with the financial statement amounts. Accordingly, the amounts may be readily available, and the reversals deemed to occur in future years for a particular asset or liability may not change from year to year. Application of the present value method, by contrast, may require computations to be made solely to determine the reversals. Further, the reversal deemed to occur in any specific future year for any particular asset or liability will change from year to year. This occurs because, as the period between the balance sheet date and the future year decreases, the discount to present value also decreases, and the reversal deemed to occur in that future year increases.
While both may be acceptable, whichever method is selected must be used consistently.
Financial instruments
Scheduling reversals of temporary differences associated with financial instruments varies depending on how the financial instrument is valued for book and tax purposes.
Carried at amortized cost for both book and tax
The selected method—loan amortization or present value, discussed in
TX 5.8.2.2—is applied separately to the book basis and to the tax basis of the financial instrument. Application to book basis would use the interest rate embedded in the book accounting, and application to tax basis would use the interest rate implicit in the tax accounting. In effect, the reversal of the temporary difference at the balance sheet date that is deemed to occur in each future year is the difference between the recovery in that year under the selected method of the book basis and of the tax basis.
In general, the reversal pattern under the loan amortization method would track the change in the temporary difference, assuming neither the book nor the tax balance increases during any year. However, for a loan receivable with a tax basis equal to the principal amount, a lower book basis, and the entire principal due at maturity, the amortization method would schedule the reversal of the entire temporary difference in the year of maturity since it is only in that year that recovery of (reduction in) the tax basis occurs. The amount of the temporary difference would change each year and, accordingly, the amount of the reversal deemed to occur in the year of maturity also would change in each year’s deferred tax calculations.
We believe that it also would be an acceptable application of the loan amortization method under
ASC 740 to consider the reversals of the temporary difference at the balance sheet date to occur as the book basis is accreted to the principal amount and the temporary difference is correspondingly reduced. Under this approach, the expected future book interest income in excess of taxable interest income in each future year would be deemed to result in a tax deduction in that year. Even though actual tax deductions are not expected to occur in this pattern, the pattern would reflect the book income expected to be recognized without being reported as taxable income.
There are situations (e.g., marketable bonds) when the discount or premium for tax purposes is amortized on a straight-line basis or is not amortized at all. We believe that it would be reasonable in such cases to consider the temporary difference to reverse in the pattern in which the discount or premium is expected to be reduced for book purposes.
ASC 310,
Receivables, requires amortization of certain net fees or costs (i.e., those related to revolving lines of credit) on a straight-line basis. Assuming that the net fees or costs were taxable (deductible) on loan origination, we believe it would be appropriate to schedule deductions (taxable income) based on expected book amortization.
Carried at amortized cost for book and fair value for tax
Debt securities that are held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost under
ASC 320,
Investments–Debt Securities, but marked to market for tax, have a temporary difference reversal pattern that may be problematic. Because the security is classified as held-to-maturity, the premium or discount for tax purposes will be presumed to disappear over the remaining life of the instrument, but it will not amortize in any systematic pattern. Rather, the market value/tax basis will change as a result of the shortening of the period to maturity, changes in market interest rates, and changes in the issuer’s credit standing. For purposes of determining the reversal pattern, we believe it is reasonable to assume that market interest rates and the issuer’s credit standing will remain unchanged to maturity. The reversal pattern would be determined as though tax reporting in the future were to be based on amortized cost using the balance-sheet-date tax basis as amortized cost at that date. The reversal in each future year would be determined as the difference between the recovery of book basis and the recovery of tax basis assigned to that year under the method (loan amortization or present value) elected for the category of temporary differences in which the security is included.
Carried at fair value for book and amortized cost for tax
When a security is carried at market under
ASC 320, but at cost or amortized cost for tax purposes, the reversal pattern will depend on management’s intentions and expectations. For example, we believe that it would not be prudent to anticipate changes in market prices in determining reversal patterns. Accordingly, the timing of the reversal of the balance-sheet-date unrealized appreciation or depreciation of a debt security should correspond to the period in which management intends to sell the security, and should be consistent with the operating plans of the entity.
On the other hand, when a debt security is classified as available-for-sale, but management has no particular expectation that it will be sold prior to maturity, the best approach may be to assume that the security will be held to maturity and that market interest rates and the issuer’s credit standing will remain unchanged. The reversal pattern then would be determined as if the security were to be carried at amortized cost in the future for book purposes using the balance-sheet-date market value as amortized cost at that date. The reversal in each future year would be determined as the difference between the recovery of book basis and the recovery of tax basis assigned to that year under the method (loan amortization or present value) elected for the category of temporary differences in which the security is included.
A company may expect to sell a debt security within the next few years but considerably in advance of its scheduled maturity. In this situation, we believe it is reasonable for the reversal pattern to mirror the pattern suggested for a debt security for which there is no particular expectation for sale; the balance of the temporary difference reversal should be assigned to the year in which sale is expected.
Leases
When a lessor records its investment in leased property as a sales-type or direct-financing lease, the book asset is measured at present value, and the accounting is similar to that for a loan receivable. The lessor accrues interest on its investment and applies lease payments to reduce it. An operating lease results in the recognition of lease income on a straight-line basis, while the underlying leased asset remains on the lessor’s balance sheet and continues to depreciate. If the agreement qualifies as a lease for tax purposes, the lessor owns a depreciable asset and depreciates the tax basis as permitted by the tax law.
Under
ASC 842, a lessee that records a right-of-use asset and lease obligation will amortize the asset over the lease term (or shorter useful life) in its financial statements. The liability is measured at present value, and the lessee accrues interest on the recorded obligation and applies lease payments to reduce it. However, if the agreement is a lease for tax purposes, the lessee is entitled to tax deductions for the full amount of its lease payments.
The accounting described in the preceding paragraphs for both the lessor and lessee is the result of a single transaction, a lease. However, both have two temporary differences. The lessor in a direct-financing or sales-type lease has an investment in the lease (an asset measured at present value) for book purposes with no tax basis, and a separate temporary difference related to the property recorded for tax purposes with no book basis. The lessee has both a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for book purposes, each with a tax basis of zero.
It is important to track the two temporary differences separately for purposes of disclosure and due to a potential impact on valuation allowance assessments. A lessor would include in its deferred tax assets the amount related to the tax basis of its depreciable property. In its deferred tax liabilities, the lessor would include the amount related to taxable income to be reported on collection of its lease payments, which are deemed to be the recovery of its investment in the leased property. The lessee would include in deferred tax assets the amount for the future deductions for lease payments, which are deemed to reduce the lease liability. In its deferred tax liabilities, the lessee would include the amount for future taxable income equal to the amortization of its right-of-use asset. In terms of disclosure, as discussed in
FSP 16.3, gross deferred tax assets and gross deferred tax liabilities must be disclosed.
The other reason to track the two temporary differences separately is to understand how the reversal pattern of the temporary differences impacts future taxable income, which could impact the measurement of valuation allowances.
Deferred compensation
For deferred compensation contracts with individual employees other than pensions and OPEBs, the accrued liability may represent the present value at the balance sheet date of stipulated payments scheduled to commence upon an employee’s retirement. Under the present value method, reversals are deemed to occur equal to the present value of payments to be made in each future year.
The loan amortization method assumes that any benefit payment applies first to interest accrued after the balance sheet date, including the interest from the balance sheet date to the retirement date, as well as the interest accruing between the retirement and payment dates. Under this approach, only a portion of payments due in the later payment years relates to the liability accrued at the balance sheet date.
In some cases, the present value at retirement of expected deferred compensation payments is accrued by straight-line charges over the period to retirement. Under
ASC 715,
Compensation—Retirement Benefits, the present value of the deferred compensation payments must be fully accrued at the “full eligibility date,” which may precede the retirement date. For simplicity, this discussion assumes those dates are the same.
Even when the accrual of the liability prior to the retirement date is not interest-adjusted, in concept the liability is measured at present value. This is why it is appropriate to apply either the loan amortization method or the present value method to expected actual future payments to determine the reversal pattern of the liability that will be accrued at the retirement date. Those reversals would be deemed to relate to the accrued liability at the balance sheet date based on the ratio of the accrued liability to the expected liability at the retirement date.
When payments will be made for the remaining life of the employee rather than for a stipulated period, the actuarial assumption used in providing the accrual also should be used in estimating the timing of the payments. The method of payment (lump sum versus annuity), as well as early or late retirement options, may be at the employee’s election. Absent any data on likely employee options that are expected to be selected, management judgment will be required.
Pensions
Accounting for pensions under
ASC 715 can give rise to a number of temporary differences. In general, there will be no pension asset or liability for tax purposes. Deductions are generally available for qualified arrangements when cash contributions are made. The pension asset or liability for financial reporting thus will constitute a temporary difference.
Because the accounting model for pensions estimates future benefit payments and discounts them to present values, at first it might seem appropriate to consider any pension an asset or liability to be measured at present value for purposes of determining reversal patterns. Further, the
ASC 715 model for OPEBs is based on the model for pensions, and we consider the recorded OPEB obligation to be a liability measured at present value as discussed above. However, because pension obligations typically are funded in advance to some extent, the US federal tax code provides for a tax deduction at the time of the funding, not at the time of the future benefit payment. As such, we do not believe the use of the loan amortization method or the present value method is appropriate under
ASC 740 for pension-related deferred tax balances. Contrast this with OPEBs, where the US Federal tax code provides for a tax deduction upon direct payment to the individual (as it is unfunded). Because of the timing of OPEB tax deductions, we believe that use of the loan amortization or present value methods would be appropriate.
We believe that it is appropriate to base the reversal of a pension asset or liability on estimates of how and when the recorded asset or liability actually will be reduced. If it is expected that there will be increases in the recorded asset or liability before reductions occur, those would be ignored. The first reductions anticipated would be deemed to apply to the asset or liability existing at the balance sheet date. This approach is similar to that for depreciable assets, when increases in the temporary difference are ignored and reversals are applied on a FIFO basis. Predictions of future events will be very important in estimating the pension reversal pattern.
There may be circumstances in which it would be difficult to estimate when reduction of the pension temporary difference will occur with any level of precision. The FASB provided a pragmatic approach, which might be reasonable depending on the entity’s circumstances. Under this approach, the temporary difference is deemed to reverse pro rata over the average remaining service life of employees expected to receive benefits under the plan. If all or almost all participants are inactive, the temporary difference is deemed to reverse pro rata over their average remaining life expectancy.
If the circumstances are such that a prepaid pension asset is not expected to reverse for the foreseeable future, the associated deferred tax liability should be treated similar to other “naked credits.” Therefore, the taxable temporary difference should not be considered a source of taxable income to support realization of deferred tax assets that have a scheduled reversal pattern or attributes that are otherwise subject to expiration. See
TX 5.5.1 for further discussion of naked credits.