Upon transition, a reporting entity is permitted to elect to use hindsight with respect to determining the lease term (e.g., they may consider the actual outcome or updated expectations of lease renewals, termination options, and purchase options) and in assessing any impairment of right-of-use assets for existing leases.
ASC 842-10-65-1(g)
An entity also may elect a practical expedient, which must be applied consistently by an entity to all of its leases (including those for which the entity is a lessee or a lessor) to use hindsight in determining the lease term (that is, when considering lessee options to extend or terminate the lease and to purchase the underlying asset) and in assessing impairment of the entity’s right-of-use assets. This practical expedient may be elected separately or in conjunction with either one or both of the practical expedients in (f) and (gg).
As noted, this provision may be elected on its own or together with either or both practical expedients, or the land easements practical expedient, but represents a policy election that should be applied consistently to all leases.
We expect that the application of hindsight will be challenging in many cases and could in some cases result in a more complex transition process.
We believe hindsight extends only up until the effective date (e.g., 1/1/22 for a calendar year-end private company) and should not incorporate information that becomes available or events that occur after that date.
The hindsight practical expedient can only be used to refresh estimates or evaluations of contractual terms that exist as of the time of measurement. A reporting entity that chooses to adjust comparative periods at transition should not apply the hindsight practical expedient to push back a contractual modification in terms such as (1) the impact of an early termination when the option to terminate was not included in the original contract or (2) an extension of the term of the lease when that extension option was not already included in the original contract.
Similarly, for payments based on an index or a rate, a reporting entity that chooses to adjust comparative periods would not push back the index or rate at the effective date to measure the lease liability as of a prior date.
A reporting entity applying the hindsight practical expedient should consider the impact on its determination of whether a lease is a short-term lease. For example, a lease may have commenced 15 months prior to the effective date with an original lease term of 10 months with a renewal option for an additional 10 months. Assume exercise of the renewal option was not reasonably assured at lease commencement, but the company subsequently exercised the renewal option. This lease would not meet the definition of a short-term lease because the lease term as of its commencement date using hindsight is 20 months.
When applying hindsight for an operating lease with non-level rents, we believe a lessee or lessor should apply the updated lease term by starting at the lease commencement date and recalculating what the accrued/deferred rent balances would have been as of the application date of the new leases guidance if the lease term known as of the effective date had been known at commencement. The lessee or lessor should record any difference between the prior and adjusted accrued/deferred balances as of the application date as an adjustment to opening equity.
Question LG 9-5 and Question LG 9-6 discuss how to assess leases when electing the hindsight practical expedient for a lessee upon transition to
ASC 842.
Question LG 9-5
Does the election of hindsight by a reporting entity require the entity to undertake a fresh assessment of the facts and circumstances that are relevant in determining the lease term even if there have been no triggering events?
PwC response
We believe a reporting entity should undertake a fresh assessment of the facts and circumstances when applying the hindsight practical expedient, taking into consideration all available information prior to the effective date that would be relevant in determining the term of the lease. For example, assume a calendar year-end private company adopts the leases standard on 1/1/2022 and has chosen to adjust the comparative period (1/1/2021 through 12/31/2021) in transition. The entity has a lease that commenced prior to 1/1/2021 and the lessee exercised an extension option on 3/1/2021. In this situation, we believe if the lessee elects hindsight at the time of adoption on 1/1/2022, the lessee should recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on 1/1/2021 assuming the extended lease term.
This is the case even if the lessee’s extension option was not exercisable in the look-back period (for example, if the extension option is only exercisable on or after 1/1/2021) but as of the effective date (i.e., 1/1/2022) it was reasonably certain that the lessee would exercise the extension option because of a change in facts and circumstances from the original assessment date. Thus, the extended lease term should be used.
Question LG 9-6
How does the use of hindsight interact with other practical expedients to either carryforward capital lease balances or to not reassess lease classification if electing the package of practical expedients?
PwC response
ASC 842-10-65-1(r)(1) prescribes transition guidance for a lessee that has a capital lease under
ASC 840 that is classified as a finance lease under
ASC 842. Under this guidance, the lessee should recognize a right-of-use asset and a leases liability at the carrying amount of the lease asset and the capital lease obligation under
ASC 840 at the initial application date. A literal application of this guidance may result in an anomalous discount rate for a lessee that has a capital lease under
ASC 840, especially if the lessee elects both the package of practical expedients and applies hindsight (to determine the lease term) when transitioning to
ASC 842. The application of hindsight could result in a shortened (or lengthened) lease term because exercise of a renewal option may no longer be reasonably certain (or may have become reasonably certain). In this situation, the discount rate required to amortize the carrying value of the capital lease obligation (determined under
ASC 840) to the appropriate amount by the end of the shortened (or lengthened) lease term may get significantly reduced (or increased).
This issue could occur whenever a lessee elects the package of practical expedients as well as the application of hindsight for its existing operating leases. In that case, the lessee would also need to apply the expedients to its existing capital leases. Because the lessee elected the package of practical expedients, it would not reassess lease classification.
Given the transition guidance in
ASC 842-10-65-1(r)(1) states that the carrying amount of the capital lease asset and capital lease obligation under
ASC 840 should be carried over into the right-of-use asset and lease liability, there are circumstances in which a literal application of that guidance in conjunction with hindsight would produce a materially distorted interest rate. This could result in a significant impact to subsequent expense recognition. Paragraph BC394 in the Basis for Conclusions of
ASC 842 indicates that the Board intended for the application of the hindsight election to result in more accurate, updated information for financial statement users. Consequently, we believe a lessee may apply the following approach to transition existing capital leases when the lessee elects to apply hindsight:
- Apply hindsight at the lease inception date to determine the appropriate lease term and discount rate.
- Using such discount rate, recalculate the new capital lease asset and capital lease obligation balance (as well as any deferred initial direct costs balance) under ASC 840 using revised lease payments as of the initial application date as though the lease term was always the updated lease term based on hindsight.
- Any difference between the recalculated and existing balances at the initial application date should be recorded as an adjustment to opening equity. Note, however, that if the reporting entity has elected to adjust the comparative periods upon adoption and the lease commenced during the comparative periods, the adjustment should be reflected in earnings during the comparative periods.
Question LG 9-7 discusses how a lessor evaluates leases when electing the hindsight practical expedient.
Question LG 9-7What is the lessor transition accounting model for a lease previously classified as a sales-type lease or direct financing lease under
ASC 840 when a lessee elects the practical expedient of hindsight for purposes of adopting the leases standard?
PwC response
We believe that a principle similar to the one described in Question LG 9-6 would apply for lessors with sales-type leases and direct financing leases.
The transition guidance in
ASC 842-10-65-1(x)(1) requires that a lessor continue to recognize a net investment in the lease at the carrying amount of the net investment under
ASC 840. A literal application of
ASC 842-10-65-1(x) could produce a materially distorted implicit interest rate in certain cases when a lessor also elects to apply hindsight. This could result in a significant impact to subsequent income recognition. Paragraph BC394 in the Basis for Conclusions of
ASC 842 indicates that the Board intended for the application of the hindsight election to result in more accurate, updated information for financial statement users. Consequently, we believe a lessor may apply the following approach to transition existing sales-type and direct financing leases when the lessor elects to apply hindsight:
- Apply hindsight at the lease inception date to determine the appropriate lease term and implicit interest rate.
- Using such discount rate, recalculate the new net investment in the lease balance under ASC 840 using the revised lease payments as of the application date as though the lease term was always the updated lease term based on hindsight.
- Any difference between the recalculated and existing balances at the application date should be recorded as an adjustment to opening equity. Note, however, that if the reporting entity has elected to adjust the comparative periods upon adoption and the lease commenced during the comparative periods, the adjustment should be reflected in earnings during the comparative periods.
The lessor should then follow the transition accounting in
ASC 842-10-65-1(x) using the recalculated balances.