The accounting for certain put options requires management to assess at contract inception whether the customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise its right. A customer that has a significant economic incentive to exercise its right is effectively paying the reporting entity for the right to use the good for a period of time, similar to a lease.
Management should consider various factors in its assessment, including the following:
- How the repurchase price compares to the expected market value of the good at the date of repurchase
- The amount of time until the right expires
A customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise a put option when the repurchase price is expected to significantly exceed the market value of the good at the time of repurchase.
Example RR 8-11 and Example RR 8-12 illustrate the accounting for arrangements that contain a put option. This concept is also illustrated in Example 62, Case B, of the revenue standard (
ASC 606-10-55-405 through
ASC 606-10-55-407).
EXAMPLE RR 8-11
Repurchase rights – put option accounted for as a right of return
Machine Co sells machinery to Manufacturer for $200,000. Manufacturer can require Machine Co to repurchase the machinery in five years for $75,000. The market value of the machinery at the repurchase date is expected to be greater than $75,000. Machine Co offers Manufacturer the put option because an overhaul is typically required after five years. Machine Co can overhaul the equipment, sell the refurbished equipment to a customer, and receive a significant margin on the refurbished goods. Assume the time value of money would not affect the overall conclusion.
Should Machine Co account for this transaction as a sale with a return right, a lease, or a financing transaction?
Analysis
Machine Co should account for the arrangement as the sale of a product with a right of return. Manufacturer does not have a significant economic incentive to exercise its right since the repurchase price is less than the expected market value at date of repurchase. Machine Co should account for the transaction consistent with the model discussed in
RR 8.2.
EXAMPLE RR 8-12
Repurchase rights – put option accounted for as lease
Machine Co sells machinery to Manufacturer for $200,000 and stipulates that Manufacturer can require Machine Co to repurchase the machinery in five years for $150,000. The repurchase price is expected to significantly exceed the market value at the date of the repurchase. Assume the time value of money would not affect the overall conclusion.
Should Manufacturer account for this transaction as a sale with a return right, a lease, or a financing transaction?
Analysis
Machine Co should account for the arrangement as a lease in accordance with the leasing guidance. Manufacturer has a put option to resell the machinery to Machine Co and has a significant economic incentive to exercise this right, because the guarantee price significantly exceeds the expected market value at date of repurchase. Lease accounting is required given the repurchase price is less than the original selling sales price of the machinery.