Expand
This section discusses the application of the general accounting requirements described in NP 9.5 to investments in limited liability companies (LLCs).
An LLC is a hybrid form of organization which can have characteristics of both a corporation and a partnership but is dissimilar from both in certain respects. The owners of an LLC are called “members,” and their ownership interests are referred to as “membership interests.” As a result of these hybrid characteristics, special considerations apply when evaluating equity interests in LLCs for potential consolidation or applicability of the equity method of accounting.
Some states allow the formation of nonprofit LLCs. An example might be an LLC where all of the members are 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations and the LLC operates exclusively to further the charitable, educational, or scientific purposes of the members. Although its purpose is to carry out a nonprofit activity, the LLC would nevertheless be evaluated for consolidation using the guidance in this chapter, rather than the guidance for evaluating consolidation of other NFP entities. Because the LLC provides its members with ownership interests, it would not meet the definition of an NFP entity for accounting purposes, as discussed at NP 5.2.
For LLC interests held within portfolios for which the PWFVO described in NP 9.3 and NP 9.6 has been elected, the determination of whether the LLC is the functional equivalent of a limited partnership or the functional equivalent of a corporation must be made in order to determine whether the interest can be measured at fair value or alternatively, must be consolidated.

9.9.1 Consolidation of LLCs

As discussed in NP 9.2.1, ASC 958-810 requires one consolidation model for evaluating interests in limited partnerships and a different model for evaluating interests in other types of entities. Thus, consolidation conclusions related to LLCs will depend on whether the entity is the functional equivalent of a limited partnership or the functional equivalent of a corporation.
To identify the appropriate model, the NFP must analyze how the LLC is governed. This involves reviewing the LLC’s structural features as set forth in its articles of organization and its operating agreement (or if there is no operating agreement, based on the laws of the state in which it was established). All relevant facts and circumstances should be considered.
In some multi-member LLCs, one investor will be designated as the managing member and the others designated as non-managing members. As explained in ASC 958-810-25-11, if the managing member has the right to make significant operating and financial decisions on behalf of the entity, the LLC is the functional equivalent of a limited partnership (and the managing member is analogous to the general partner), and consolidation is evaluated using the model for limited partnerships discussed in NP 9.8.2. Under the limited partnership model, a presumption exists that the general partner controls the partnership and should consolidate it, unless limited partners have rights that overcome the presumption of control.

Excerpt from ASC 958-810-25-11

A similar legal entity is an entity (such as a limited liability company) that has governing provisions that are the functional equivalent of a limited partnership. In those entities, a managing member is the functional equivalent of a general partner, and a nonmanaging member is the functional equivalent of a limited partner.

If an LLC does not have the equivalent of managing and non-managing members, the evaluation of consolidation would use the model discussed in NP 9.7.1 for investments in common stock of a corporation. Typically, corporate-equivalent LLCs will have either a single member or will be governed by a board of members. Under this model, the usual condition for consolidation is ownership by the investor of a majority voting interest in the entity. For an LLC, this would translate to ownership of over 50% of the member interests.
Question NP 9-4 illustrates a consolidation analysis for an LLC that is the functional equivalent of a limited partnership.
Question NP 9-4
Investment LLC has three members. The LLC’s operating agreement designates one of the members as the managing member and provides that member with the authority to direct the LLC’s operations and enter into binding contracts on the LLC’s behalf. The two non-managing members have no authority beyond certain limited rights granted in the operating agreement that are neither kick-out rights nor participating rights. How would the members evaluate their interests in the LLC for potential consolidation?
PwC response
In this arrangement, decision-making is vested in a single managing member in a structure that closely resembles a limited partnership. Therefore, the members would evaluate their interests for potential consolidation using the guidance in ASC 958-810-15-4(b).
According to that model, a presumption exists that the managing member controls the LLC and should consolidate it, unless non-managing members have substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights that would overcome the presumption of control. In this fact pattern, the non-managing members do not have such rights; thus, the managing member would consolidate the LLC.

Example NP 9-2 in NP 9.9.2 illustrates the consolidation analysis for a board-managed LLC.
Question NP 9-5 addresses consolidation of a single-member LLC.
Question NP 9-5
An NFP hospital wishes to expand its services by forming a tax-exempt subsidiary. Under IRS rules, an LLC can carry out tax-exempt activities on behalf of a Section 501(c)(3) exempt parent without obtaining a separate tax-exemption determination. Therefore, instead of creating a separate NFP corporation that would need to apply for tax-exempt status, the hospital chooses to organize the subsidiary as a single-member LLC. How would the LLC be evaluated for potential consolidation?
PwC response
As a single-member entity, the LLC has no other owners with whom the hospital must share decision-making or profits. In this fact pattern, the LLC is the functional equivalent of a wholly-owned corporate subsidiary. Consolidation would be evaluated based on the guidance in ASC 958-810-15-4(a) for investees other than limited partnerships. Because the hospital holds all decision-making authority through its membership interest, it would be required to consolidate the LLC.

An LLC’s structure may not clearly resemble either a corporation or a limited partnership. For example, an LLC may have both a managing member and a board of members. In that case, a careful analysis would be required to determine which consolidation model to apply. CG 7.1.1 discusses this situation.

9.9.2 Noncontrolling interests in LLCs

An NFP with a noncontrolling interest in an LLC must determine whether to account for the investment using the equity method or the guidance in ASC 321 (see NP 9.7). Instead of focusing on governance and decision-making rights (as is required for the consolidation evaluation), selection of the appropriate model focuses on how the LLC determines its members’ interests in its underlying net assets—i.e., how it would distribute its equity to the members.
Many LLCs maintain individual capital accounts that track members’ cumulative investments, participation in profits and losses, and distributions in a manner similar to partnership capital accounts. In other LLCs, the operating agreement attaches voting rights, participation in profits and losses, and entitlement to equity to units in a pro-rata fashion so that economically, the rights associated with any one unit are indistinguishable from another (similar to the rights associated with common stock). In those cases, a member’s equity is determined based on the number of units it holds relative to other members. (This would not include situations when “units” are used as a bookkeeping mechanism to facilitate allocations of profits and losses among members.)
ASC 958-810-15-4(d) directs NFPs to apply the guidance in ASC 323-30-35-3 to determine whether noncontrolling interests should be accounted for using the limited partnership model described in NP 9.8.3 or the corporation model described in NP 9.7.2 and NP 9.7.3. According to that guidance, the model for limited partnerships is used if individual capital accounts are maintained; otherwise, the model for corporations is used.
Because this evaluation considers a different attribute of the LLC’s structure, an LLC that is viewed as similar to a corporation when evaluating consolidation might be viewed as similar to a limited partnership for purposes of the equity method evaluation. Example NP 9-2 illustrates such a situation.
EXAMPLE NP 9-2
Evaluating consolidation of an LLC shared services entity
Shared Services Entity (SSE) is a nonprofit LLC with four members, all of which are 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. SSE is organized exclusively for tax-exempt purposes and operates exclusively to further the charitable, educational, or scientific purposes of its members. Note that because the LLC provides its members with ownership interests, it does not meet the definition of an NFP entity for accounting purposes, even though its purpose is to carry out a nonprofit activity. See related discussion at NP 5.2.
According to the operating agreement, the responsibility for SSE’s governance, oversight, and management is vested in a board comprised of the members. Decisions of the board are legally binding (that is, the board is not merely advisory in nature.) The operating agreement also stipulates each member’s “participation percentage” for purposes of voting and distribution of profits or losses (which are 40%, 30%, 20%, and 10%, respectively). Each member has a capital account that rolls forward its cumulative investments, participation in profits and losses, and distributions received.
How should SSE’s members account for their interests?
Analysis
Each member would first consider whether its interest requires consolidation. When evaluating consolidation, the members would use the model described in NP 9.7.1 (for entities other than limited partnerships). SSE has no “managing member” who possesses exclusive decision-making responsibility. Instead, all members participate in decision-making through the board of members, with voting rights that are proportional to their participation percentages. In this fact pattern, none of the members has a controlling financial interest that would require consolidation, as no single member has a participation percentage of over 50%.
Next, each member would evaluate whether the equity method of accounting or the guidance in ASC 321 should be applied. Because SSE maintains separate capital accounts for each member (similar to a partnership capital account), the model for noncontrolling interests in limited partnerships would be used. Because SSE is not engaged in real estate activities, its members are not required to apply the model in ASC 970-323 for real estate limited partnerships but may apply that model by analogy. If a member chooses to analogize, the equity method would generally be applied, as its members all participate in management (that is, SSE has no non-managing members).
If a member does not wish to analogize to the real estate model, it would report its interest at fair value in accordance with ASC 321.

Question NP 9-6 illustrates the analysis for an interest in a real estate LLC that has member capital accounts similar to a partnership.
Question NP 9-6
Real Estate LLC has 3 members: a managing member with authority to direct the LLC’s operations and two non-managing members with no authority beyond certain limited rights granted to them in the operating agreement. The managing member controls and consolidates the LLC. Each member has a capital account that rolls forward its cumulative investments, participation in profits and losses, and distributions received. What accounting would the non-managing members apply to their noncontrolling interests?
PwC response
Because Real Estate LLC maintains separate capital accounts for each member (similar to partnership capital accounts) the non-managing members are required to evaluate the investment in the LLC as a limited partnership.
According to the model in ASC 970-323 for real estate limited partnerships, the equity method should be applied by limited partners unless the partner’s interest is so minor that it has virtually no influence over the partnership’s operations and financial policies. Therefore, if the non-managing members’ interests are “more than minor,” they would apply the equity method. For information on evaluating “more than minor,” see NP 9.8.3.
Expand Expand
Resize
Tools
Rcl

Welcome to Viewpoint, the new platform that replaces Inform. Once you have viewed this piece of content, to ensure you can access the content most relevant to you, please confirm your territory.

signin option menu option suggested option contentmouse option displaycontent option contentpage option relatedlink option prevandafter option trending option searchicon option search option feedback option end slide